Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · H.R. 1960 (Engrossed in House) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military c... · Sec. 261

Sec. 261. Establishment of Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board

387 words·~2 min read·/bill/113/hr/1960/eh/section-261

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: There shall be in the Department of Defense a Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board (in this section referred to as the Board ) to review and assess the cryptographic modernization activities of the Department and provide advice to the Secretary with respect to such activities pursuant to the roles and responsibilities outlined in the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 6510.02D.
The Secretary shall determine the number of members of the Board. The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of general or admiral and civilian employees of the Department of Defense in the Senior Executive Service to serve as members of the Board. The Board shall— review compliance with cease-use dates for specific cryptographic systems based on rigorous analysis of technical and threat factors and issue guidance, as needed, to relevant program executive offices and program managers; monitor the overall cryptographic modernization efforts of the Department, including while such efforts are being executed; convene in-depth technical program reviews, as needed, for specific cryptographic modernization developments with respect to validating current and in-draft requirements of systems of the Department of Defense and identifying programmatic risks; develop a five-year cryptographic modernization plan to— make recommendations to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council with respect to updating or modifying requirements for cryptographic modernization; and identify previously unidentified requirements; develop a long-term roadmap to— ensure synchronization with major planning documents; anticipate risks and issues in 10- and 20-year timelines; and ensure that the expertise and insights of the military departments, Defense Agencies, the combatant commands, industry, academia, and key allies are included in the course of developing and carrying out cryptographic modernization activities; develop a concept of operations for how cryptographic systems should function in a system-of-systems environment; and advise the Secretary on the development of a cryptographic asset visibility system.
The Board shall not include programs funded under the National Intelligence Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3003(6) )) in carrying out this section. . The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 188 the following new item: 189. Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board. .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 261
Establishment of Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.