Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

J Bacon Sons v. Martin

305 U.S. 380· 1939· U.S. Supreme Court· cites 9 cases
305 U.S. 380 (1939) J. BACON & SONS v. MARTIN. No. 203. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 15, 1938. Decided January 3, 1939. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY. Mr. Charles I. Dawson for appellant. Messrs. Hubert Meredith, Attorney General of Kentucky, and M.B. Holifield, Assistant Attorney General, were on a brief for appellee. PER CURIAM. Plaintiff sought judgment declaring invalid a statute imposing a tax on "the receipt of cosmetics in the State by any Kentucky retailer," [1] as applied to articles purchased from manufacturers and dealers in other States and transported to plaintiff at its place of business in Kentucky. Plaintiff contended that the tax was on "the act of receiving" and hence was a direct burden upon interstate commerce. The Court of Appeals of Kentucky thus construed the statute: "The word `receipt' is not used in a limited sense, but in the sense that it has already been received by the retailer and is now in his use. . . . That word `receipt' presupposes *381 that the cosmetics were now in use and after the sale had been consummated. ". . . It, therefore, follows that the imposition of the tax against the retailer is not on the act of receiving the cosmetics, but on the sale and use thereof, after the retailer has received them, that constitutes the excise tax. When we apply the intended and correct meaning of the word `receipt' as used in the act, it is conclusive to our minds that the tax of the retailer, referred to, is paid when the articles are in his possession and when the merchant has unlimited control and dominion over the cosmetics." Martin v. J. Bacon & Sons, 268 Ky. 612 , 618, 619; 105 S.W.2d 569 , 572. Adhering to that construction, the state court affirmed the present judgment sustaining the tax. 273 Ky. 389 ; 116 S.W.2d 963 . The plaintiff appeals. The construction of the statute by the state court is binding upon us. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30 , 32, 33; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U.S. 169 , 172; Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Nelson Manufacturing Co., 291 U.S. 352 , 358. And in the light of its construction the state court applied the principles declared in our decisions. Monamotor Oil Co. v. Johnson, 292 U.S. 86 , 93; Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query, 286 U.S. 472 , 478, 479; Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Wallace, 288 U.S. 249 , 265, 266; Edelman v. Boeing Air Transport, Inc., 289 U.S. 249 , 252. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Dismissed. NOTES [1] Subsection (f) of § 2 of Chapter 3 of the 1936 Special Budget and Special Revenue Session of the Legislature of Kentucky. Carroll's Kentucky Statutes, Baldwin's 1936 Revision, §§ 4281d-1 to 4281d-25.

Public-domain opinion of the United States Supreme Court, reproduced from the court record (U.S. Reports). Historical text may contain OCR artifacts. Provided for reference — not legal advice.

★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.