Compare "Const."
Search a term across every codebook at once. Expand any result inline, and pin the ones worth keeping to your shelf — they stay put while you keep searching.
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 776.29Instrumentalities and channels of interstate commerce.
would not exclude it from the Act's coverage. 33 33 Tobin v. Pennington-Winter Const. Co., ante; Oklahoma v. Atkinson Co., 313 U.S. 508; Cuascut v. Standard Dredging Corp ... Loftis Co., 167 F. (2d) 286 (C.A. 4). 36 Walling v. McCrady Const. Co., ante. 37 Divins v. Hazeltine Electronics Corp., 163 F. (2d) 100 (C.A. 2); Cf. Walling v. Haile Gold
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 776.26Relationship of the construction work to the covered facility.
Mitchell v. Vollmer, ante; Bennett v. V. P. Loftis Co., ante; Mitchell v. Chambers Const. Co., 214 F. (2d) 515 (C.A. 10); Walling v. McCrady Const. Co., ante; Tobin v. Pennington-Winter ... Const. Co., 198 F. (2d) 334 (C.A. 5), certiorari denied
- /us/cfr/t38/s§ 17.419Health care professionals' practice in VA.
Federal law and policy. (c) Preemption of State law. Pursuant to the Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const. art. IV, cl. 2, and in order to achieve important Federal interests, including, but not limited
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 776.27Construction which is related to covered production.
premises of such a facility. 17 Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling, ante; Walling v. McCrady Const. Co., ante. (3) On the other hand, the production and furnishings, within the State, of construction materials ... maintenance and repair, it would be subject to the Act. 22 22 Walling v. McCrady Const. Co., ante. (d) Production of materials for use in construction work on interstate instrumentalities
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 776.23Employment in the construction industry.
bookkeeping, auditing, promotional, drafting, engineering, custodial and stock room employees. 11 10 Walling v. McCrady Const. Co., 156 F. (2d) 932, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 785; Chambers Construction ... Chambers v. Mitchell, decided June 5, 1956 (C.A. 8); Tobin v. Pennington-Winter Const. Co. ante; Mitchell v. Vollmer Co., ante. 11 Mitchell v. Brown Engineering Co., ante; Chambers Construction
- /us/cfr/t10/s§ 210.1Records.
(a) The recordkeeping requirements that were in effect on January
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 780.707Establishments "commonly recognized" as country elevators.
grain storage (see Tobin v. Flour Mils, 185 F. 2d 596; Mitchell v. Sampson Const. Co. (D. Kan.) 14 WH Cases
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 780.708A country elevator is located near and serves farmers.
country elevators have been recognized by the courts. See, for example, Mitchell v. Sampson Const. Co. (D. Kan.) 14 WH Cases 269; Tobin v. Flour Mills, 185 F. 2d 596; Holt
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 780.709Size and equipment of a country elevator.
receive grain except by rail. (See Tobin v. Flour Mills, supra; Mitchell v. Sampson Const. Co. (D. Kan.) 14 WH Cases 269.) It is the facilities of a country elevator
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 776.30Construction performed on temporarily idle facilities.
Fitzgerald Construction Co., ante; Bennett v. V. P. Loftis, ante; Walling v. McCrady Const. Co., ante; and Bodden v. McCormick Shipping Corp., 188 F. (2d) 733. 54 Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural
- /us/cfr/t29/s§ 776.22bGuiding principles.
Bennett v. V. P. Loftis Co., 167 F. (2d) 286 (C.A.4); Tobin v. Pennington-Winter Const. Co., 198 F. (2d) 334 (C.A.10), certiorari denied 345 U.S. 915; See General Coverage Bulletin
New: pin two sections to the shelf, select them, and get a word-for-word diff. Coming next — a plain-English summary of what actually differs, every claim linked back to the source.