Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Wisconsin · Chapter 971 — Criminal procedure — proceedings before and at trial

971.36 Theft; pleading and evidence; subsequent prosecutions.

413 words·~2 min read·/wi/chapter-971/971-36-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

971.36 Theft; pleading and evidence; subsequent prosecutions.
(1)In any criminal pleading for theft, it is sufficient to charge that the defendant did steal the property (describing it) of the owner (naming the owner) of the value of (stating the value in money).
(2)Any criminal pleading for theft may contain a count for receiving the same property and the jury may find all or any of the persons charged guilty of either of the crimes.
(3)In any case of theft involving more than one theft, all thefts may be prosecuted as a single crime if one of the following applies:
(a)The property belonged to the same owner and the thefts were committed pursuant to a single intent and design or in execution of a single deceptive scheme.
(b)The property belonged to the same owner and was stolen by a person in possession of it.
(c)The property belonged to more than one owner and was stolen from the same place pursuant to a single intent and design.
(d)If the property is mail, as defined in s. 943.204
(d), the property was stolen from one or more owners during a course of conduct, as defined in s. 947.013
(a).
(4)In any case of theft involving more than one theft but prosecuted as a single crime, it is sufficient to allege generally a theft of property to a certain value committed between certain dates, without specifying any particulars. On the trial, evidence may be given of any such theft committed on or between the dates alleged; and it is sufficient to maintain the charge and is not a variance if it is proved that any property was stolen during such period. But an acquittal or conviction in any such case does not bar a subsequent prosecution for any acts of theft on which no evidence was received at the trial of the original charge. In case of a conviction on the original charge on a plea of guilty or no contest, the district attorney may, at any time before sentence, file a bill of particulars or other written statement specifying what particular acts of theft are included in the charge and in that event conviction does not bar a subsequent prosecution for any other acts of theft.
(5)In any case involving aggregated acts under s. 943.20
(5)or 943.50
(6), notwithstanding sub.
(3), the acts may be prosecuted as a single crime.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.