939.24 Criminal recklessness.
279 words·~1 min read·
/wi/chapter-939/939-24-2A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
939.24 Criminal recklessness.
(1)In this section, “criminal recklessness” means that the actor creates an unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm to another human being and the actor is aware of that risk, except that for purposes of ss. 940.02
(1m), 940.06
(2)and 940.23
(b)and
(b), “criminal recklessness” means that the actor creates an unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm to an unborn child, to the woman who is pregnant with that unborn child or to another and the actor is aware of that risk.
(2)Except as provided in ss. 940.285 , 940.29 , 940.295 , and 943.76 , if criminal recklessness is an element of a crime in chs. 939 to 951 , the recklessness is indicated by the term “reckless” or “recklessly”.
939.24 Note Judicial Council Note, 1988: This section is new. It provides a uniform definition of criminal recklessness, the culpable mental state of numerous offenses. Recklessness requires both the creation of an objectively unreasonable and substantial risk of human death or great bodily harm and the actor’s subjective awareness of that risk.
939.24 Note Sub.
(3)continues the present rule that a voluntarily produced intoxicated or drugged condition is not a defense to liability for criminal recklessness. Ameen v. State, 51 Wis. 2d 175 , 185 (1971). Patterned on s. 2.08 of the model penal code, it premises liability on whether the actor would have been aware if not in such condition of the risk of death or great bodily harm. The commentaries to s. 2.08, model penal code, state the rationale of this rule in extended fashion. [Bill 191-S]