Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Wisconsin · Chapter 904 — Evidence — relevancy and its limits

904.04 Character evidence not admissible to prove conduct; exceptions; other crimes.

409 words·~2 min read·/wi/chapter-904/904-04

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

904.04 Character evidence not admissible to prove conduct; exceptions; other crimes.
(1)Character evidence generally. Evidence of a person’s character or a trait of the person’s character is not admissible for the purpose of proving that the person acted in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, except:
(a)Character of accused. Evidence of a pertinent trait of the accused’s character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same;
(b)Character of victim. Except as provided in s. 972.11
(2), evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same, or evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the first aggressor;
(c)Character of witness. Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in ss. 906.07 , 906.08 and 906.09 .
(2)Other crimes, wrongs, or acts.
(a)General admissibility. Except as provided in par.
(b)2. , evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith. This subsection does not exclude the evidence when offered for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.
(b)Greater latitude.
1. In a criminal proceeding alleging a violation of s. 940.302
(2)or of ch. 948 , alleging the commission of a serious sex offense, as defined in s. 939.615
(b), or of domestic abuse, as defined in s. 968.075
(a), or alleging an offense that, following a conviction, is subject to the surcharge in s. 973.055 , evidence of any similar acts by the accused is admissible, and is admissible without regard to whether the victim of the crime that is the subject of the proceeding is the same as the victim of the similar act.
2. In a criminal proceeding alleging a violation of s. 940.225
(1)or 948.02
(1), sub.
(1)and par.
(a)do not prohibit admitting evidence that a person was convicted of a violation of s. 940.225
(1)or 948.02
(1)or a comparable offense in another jurisdiction, that is similar to the alleged violation, as evidence of the person’s character in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.