Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Wisconsin · Chapter 173 — Animals; humane officers

173.22 Review of seizure or withholding.

196 words·~1 min read·/wi/chapter-173/173-22

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

173.22 Review of seizure or withholding.
(1)Petition. A person claiming that an animal that he or she owns was improperly taken into custody under s. 173.13
(a)3. , 4. , 5. , or 6. or is wrongfully withheld under s. 173.21
(b)or
(d)may seek return of the animal by petitioning for an order from the circuit court for the county in which the animal was taken into custody or in which it is held.
(2)Notice and hearing. The court shall provide notice of a petition under sub.
(1)to the humane officer or law enforcement officer who took the animal into custody or to the political subdivision that withheld the animal and shall hold a hearing on the issue of whether the animal was improperly taken into custody or is wrongfully withheld.
(3)Order.
(a)If the animal is withheld under s. 173.21
(b)or
(d), the court shall order the animal returned to the owner unless it determines that one of the following conditions is satisfied:
2. There are reasonable grounds to believe that the animal poses a significant threat to public health, safety or welfare.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.