Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 7 — Special Proceedings and Actions · Chapter 7.70

RCW 7.70.050

346 words·~2 min read·/wa/title-7/chapter-7-70/7-70-050

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)The following shall be necessary elements of proof that injury resulted from health care in a civil negligence case or arbitration involving the issue of the alleged breach of the duty to secure an informed consent by a patient or his or her representatives against a health care provider:
(a)That the health care provider failed to inform the patient of a material fact or facts relating to the treatment;
(b)That the patient consented to the treatment without being aware of or fully informed of such material fact or facts;
(c)That a reasonably prudent patient under similar circumstances would not have consented to the treatment if informed of such material fact or facts;
(d)That the treatment in question proximately caused injury to the patient.
(2)Under the provisions of this section a fact is defined as or considered to be a material fact, if a reasonably prudent person in the position of the patient or his or her representative would attach significance to it deciding whether or not to submit to the proposed treatment.
(3)Material facts under the provisions of this section which must be established by expert testimony shall be either:
(a)The nature and character of the treatment proposed and administered;
(b)The anticipated results of the treatment proposed and administered;
(c)The recognized possible alternative forms of treatment; or
(d)The recognized serious possible risks, complications, and anticipated benefits involved in the treatment administered and in the recognized possible alternative forms of treatment, including nontreatment.
(4)If a recognized health care emergency exists and the patient does not have the capacity to give an informed consent and/or a person legally authorized to consent on behalf of the patient is not readily available, his or her consent to required treatment will be implied.
[ 2021 c 270 s 2 ; 2011 c 336 s 252 ; 1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 56 s 10.]
Notes:
Effective date — 2021 c 270: See note following RCW 7.70.065 .
Severability — 1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 56: See note following RCW 4.16.350 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.