Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 7 — Special Proceedings and Actions · Chapter 7.16

RCW 7.16.120

149 words·~1 min read·/wa/title-7/chapter-7-16/7-16-120·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The questions involving the merits to be determined by the court upon the hearing are:
(1)Whether the body or officer had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the determination under review.
(2)Whether the authority, conferred upon the body or officer in relation to that subject matter, has been pursued in the mode required by law, in order to authorize it or to make the determination.
(3)Whether, in making the determination, any rule of law affecting the rights of the parties thereto has been violated to the prejudice of the relator.
(4)Whether there was any competent proof of all the facts necessary to be proved, in order to authorize the making of the determination.
(5)Whether the factual determinations were supported by substantial evidence.
[ 1989 c 7 s 1 ; 1957 c 51 s 6 ; 1895 c 65 s 12 ; RRS s 1010.]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.