Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 69 — Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons · Chapter 69.51A

RCW 69.51A.045

211 words·~1 min read·/wa/title-69/chapter-69-51a/69-51a-045·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)A qualifying patient or designated provider in possession of plants, cannabis concentrates, useable cannabis, or cannabis-infused products exceeding the limits set forth in this chapter but otherwise in compliance with all other terms and conditions of this chapter may establish an affirmative defense to charges of violations of state law relating to cannabis through proof at trial, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the qualifying patient's necessary medical use exceeds the amounts set forth in RCW 69.51A.040 .
(2)An investigating law enforcement officer may seize plants, cannabis concentrates, useable cannabis, or cannabis-infused products exceeding the amounts set forth in this chapter. In the case of plants, the qualifying patient or designated provider shall be allowed to select the plants that will remain at the location. The officer and his or her law enforcement agency may not be held civilly liable for failure to seize cannabis in this circumstance.
[ 2022 c 16 s 120 ; 2015 c 70 s 29 ; 2011 c 181 s 405 .]
Notes:
Intent — Finding — 2022 c 16: See note following RCW 69.50.101 .
Short title — Findings — Intent — References to Washington state liquor control board — Draft legislation — 2015 c 70: See notes following RCW 66.08.012 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.