Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 50 — Unemployment Compensation · Chapter 50.22

RCW 50.22.140

404 words·~2 min read·/wa/title-50/chapter-50-22/50-22-140·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)The employment security department is authorized to pay training benefits under RCW 50.22.150 and 50.22.155 , but may not obligate expenditures beyond the limits specified in this section or as otherwise set by the legislature. Any funds not obligated in one fiscal year may be carried forward to the next fiscal year. The commissioner may not obligate more than twenty million dollars annually in addition to any funds carried forward from previous fiscal years.
(2)If the amount available for training benefits at any time is equal to or less than five million dollars, funds will no longer be obligated for individuals in RCW 50.22.155 (2)(a)(ii). If funds are exhausted, training benefits will continue to be obligated to dislocated workers only under RCW 50.22.155 (2)(a)(i). The following year's obligation for training benefits will be reduced by a corresponding amount.
[ 2011 c 4 s 10 ; 2002 c 149 s 1 ; 2000 2nd sp.s. c 1 s 916 ; 2000 c 2 s 7 .]
Notes:
Contingent effective date — 2011 c 4 ss 7-15: See note following RCW 50.20.099 .
Conflict with federal requirements — 2011 c 4: See note following RCW 50.29.021 .
Conflict with federal requirements — 2002 c 149: "If any part of this act is found to be in conflict with federal requirements that are a prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the state or the eligibility of employers in this state for federal unemployment tax credits, the conflicting part of this act is inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict, and the finding or determination does not affect the operation of the remainder of this act. Rules adopted under this act must meet federal requirements that are a necessary condition to the receipt of federal funds by the state or the granting of federal unemployment tax credits to employers in this state." [ 2002 c 149 s 15 .]
Severability — 2002 c 149: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 2002 c 149 s 16 .]
Severability — Effective date — 2000 2nd sp.s. c 1: See notes following RCW 41.05.143 .
Conflict with federal requirements — Severability — Effective date — 2000 c 2: See notes following RCW 50.04.355 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.