Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 49 — Labor Regulations · Chapter 49.58

RCW 49.58.030

570 words·~3 min read·/wa/title-49/chapter-49-58/49-58-030·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)The legislature finds that equality of opportunity for advancement is key to reducing income disparities based on gender and memberships in protected classes. The legislature further finds that using gender or membership in a protected class as a factor in advancement contributes to pay inequity.
(2)An employer may not, on the basis of a person's gender or other membership in a protected class, limit or deprive an employee of career advancement opportunities that would otherwise be available.
(3)A differential in career advancement based on a bona fide job-related factor or factors that meet the criteria in RCW 49.58.020 (3)(a)
(i)through
(iii)does not constitute discrimination within the meaning of this section. Such bona fide factors include, but are not limited to, the factors specified in RCW 49.58.020 (3)(b)
(i)through (iv).
(4)(a) If it is determined that an employer committed a pattern of violations of this section as to an employee or committed a violation of this section through application of a formal or informal employer policy or practice, the employee is entitled to the remedies in this section and in RCW 49.58.070 .
(b)Upon complaint by an employee, the director must investigate to determine if there has been compliance with this section and the rules adopted to implement this section. The director, upon complaint, may also initiate an investigation on behalf of one or more employees for a violation of this section and the rules adopted to implement this section. The director may require the testimony of witnesses and production of documents as part of an investigation.
(c)If the director determines that a violation occurred, the director shall attempt to resolve the violation by conference and conciliation.
(d)If no agreement is reached to resolve the violation and the director determines that the employer committed a pattern of violations of this section as to an employee or committed a violation of this section through application of a formal or informal employer policy or practice, the director may issue a citation and notice of assessment and order:
(i)The employer to pay to the employee actual damages, statutory damages equal to the actual damages or $5,000, whichever is greater, and interest of one percent per month on all compensation owed;
(ii)The employer to pay to the department the costs of investigation and enforcement; and
(iii)Any other appropriate relief.
(e)In addition to the citation and notice of assessment, if the director determines that the employer committed a pattern of violations of this section as to an employee or committed a violation of this section through application of a formal or informal employer policy or practice, the director may order payment to the department of a civil penalty. The violation as to each affected employee constitutes a separate violation.
(i)For a first violation, the civil penalty may not exceed $500.
(ii)For a repeat violation, the civil penalty may not exceed $1,000 or 10 percent of the damages, whichever is greater.
(f)RCW 49.58.060 (3), (4), and
(5)applies to this section.
(5)Subject to subsection (4)(a) of this section, a person may file a complaint or bring an action under this chapter asserting discrimination based on the person's membership in more than one protected class.
[ 2024 c 353 s 4 ; 2018 c 116 s 4 .]
Notes:
Effective date — 2024 c 353: See note following RCW 49.58.020 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.