RCW 48.200.320
227 words·~1 min read·
/wa/title-48/chapter-48-200/48-200-320·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(1)A pharmacy benefit manager may not retaliate against a pharmacist or pharmacy for disclosing information in a court, in an administrative hearing, or legislative hearing, if the pharmacist or pharmacy has a good faith belief that the disclosed information is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law, rule, or regulation.
(2)A pharmacy benefit manager may not retaliate against a pharmacist or pharmacy for disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency, if the pharmacist or pharmacy has a good faith belief that the disclosed information is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law, rule, or regulation.
(3)A pharmacist or pharmacy shall make reasonable efforts to limit the disclosure of confidential and proprietary information.
(4)Retaliatory actions against a pharmacy or pharmacist include cancellation of, restriction of, or refusal to renew or offer a contract to a pharmacy solely because the pharmacy or pharmacist has:
(a)Made disclosures of information that the pharmacist or pharmacy believes is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law, rule, or regulation;
(b)Filed complaints with the plan or pharmacy benefit manager; or
(c)Filed complaints against the plan or pharmacy benefit manager with the commissioner.
[ 2024 c 242 s 8 .]
Notes:
Effective date — 2024 c 242 ss 5 and 7-9: See note following RCW 48.200.280 .