Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 36 — Counties · Chapter 36.70B

RCW 36.70B.040

300 words·~1 min read·/wa/title-36/chapter-36-70b/36-70b-040·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)A proposed project's consistency with a local government's development regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, or, in the absence of applicable development regulations, the appropriate elements of the comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW shall be decided by the local government during project review by consideration of:
(a)The type of land use;
(b)The level of development, such as units per acre or other measures of density;
(c)Infrastructure, including public facilities and services needed to serve the development; and
(d)The characteristics of the development, such as development standards.
(2)In deciding whether a project is consistent, the determinations made pursuant to RCW 36.70B.030
(2)shall be controlling.
(3)For purposes of this section, the term "consistency" shall include all terms used in this chapter and chapter 36.70A RCW to refer to performance in accordance with this chapter and chapter 36.70A RCW, including but not limited to compliance, conformity, and consistency.
(4)Nothing in this section requires documentation, dictates an agency's procedures for considering consistency, or limits a city or county from asking more specific or related questions with respect to any of the four main categories listed in subsection (1)(a) through
(d)of this section.
(5)The department of commerce is authorized to develop and adopt by rule criteria to assist local governments planning under RCW 36.70A.040 to analyze the consistency of project actions. These criteria shall be jointly developed with the department of ecology.
[ 2023 c 470 s 2020 ; 1997 c 429 s 46 ; 1995 c 347 s 405 .]
Notes:
Explanatory statement — 2023 c 470: See note following RCW 10.99.030 .
Severability — 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201 .
Intent — Findings — 1995 c 347 ss 404 and 405: See note following RCW 36.70B.030 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.