Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 36 — Counties · Chapter 36.70A

RCW 36.70A.067

371 words·~2 min read·/wa/title-36/chapter-36-70a/36-70a-067·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The initial effective date of an action that expands an urban growth area designated under RCW 36.70A.110 , removes the designation of agricultural, forest, or mineral resource lands designated under RCW 36.70A.170 , creates or expands a limited area of more intensive rural development designated under RCW 36.70A.070 (5)(d), establishes a new fully contained community under RCW 36.70A.350 , or creates or expands a master planned resort designated under RCW 36.70A.360 , is after the latest of the following dates:
(1)60 days after the date of publication of notice of adoption of the comprehensive plan, development regulation, or amendment to the plan or regulation, implementing the action, as provided in RCW 36.70A.290 (2); or
(2)If a petition for review to the growth management hearings board is timely filed, upon issuance of the board's final order.
[ 2022 c 218 s 2 .]
Notes:
Findings — Intent — 2022 c 218: "The legislature finds that climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing our state and the world today, an existential crisis with major negative impacts on environmental and human health. The legislature further finds that compact and responsibly planned development of residential and public facilities, intended under the growth management act, mitigates climate change through the efficient use of energy resources and the corresponding decrease in greenhouse gas production. This dense development and the concentration of growth in urban areas also prevents sprawl, lessening development's impact on natural resources, ecosystems, and habitats.
The legislature also finds that current legal frameworks work against the act's goal of responsibly planned for growth by prematurely allowing development rights to vest before the validity of plans and regulations can be determined. This flawed process has led to the approval of development that has decreased resource lands and placed a strain on local infrastructure services. Furthermore, it makes it extremely difficult for local jurisdictions to come back into compliance with state laws and leaves citizens with no real remedy to undo these planning violations.
Therefore, the legislature intends to set the effective date of these impactful planning actions to a time that will allow for the thorough review of growth planning decisions intended under the act." [ 2022 c 218 s 1 .]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.