Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 26 — Domestic Relations · Chapter 26.09

RCW 26.09.138

566 words·~3 min read·/wa/title-26/chapter-26-09/26-09-138·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 2034-S2.SL ) ***
(1)Any obligee of a court order or decree establishing a spousal maintenance obligation may seek a mandatory benefits assignment order under chapter 41.50 RCW if any spousal maintenance payment is more than fifteen days past due and the total of such past due payments is equal to or greater than one hundred dollars, or if the obligor requests a withdrawal of accumulated contributions from the department of retirement systems.
(2)Any court order or decree establishing a spousal maintenance obligation may state that, if any spousal maintenance payment is more than fifteen days past due and the total of such past due payments is equal to or greater than one hundred dollars, or if the obligor requests a withdrawal of accumulated contributions from the department of retirement systems, the obligee may seek a mandatory benefits assignment order under chapter 41.50 RCW without prior notice to the obligor. Any such court order or decree may also, or in the alternative, contain a provision that would allow the department to make a direct payment of all or part of a withdrawal of accumulated contributions pursuant to RCW 41.50.550 (3). Failure to include this provision does not affect the validity of the court order or decree establishing the spousal maintenance, nor does such failure affect the general applicability of RCW 41.50.500 through 41.50.650 to such obligations.
(3)The remedies in RCW 41.50.530 through 41.50.630 are the exclusive provisions of law enforceable against the department of retirement systems in connection with any action for enforcement of a spousal maintenance obligation ordered pursuant to a divorce, dissolution, or legal separation, and no other remedy ordered by a court under this chapter shall be enforceable against the department of retirement systems for collection of spousal maintenance.
(4)(a) Nothing in this section regarding mandatory assignment of benefits to enforce a spousal maintenance obligation shall abridge the right of an ex spouse to receive direct payment of retirement benefits payable pursuant to:
(i)A court decree of dissolution or legal separation; or
(ii)any court order or court-approved property settlement agreement; or
(iii)incident to any court decree of dissolution or legal separation, if such dissolution orders fully comply with RCW 41.50.670 and 41.50.700 , or as applicable, RCW 2.10.180 , 2.12.090 , * 41.04.310 , 41.04.320 , 41.04.330 , ** 41.26.180 , 41.32.052 , 41.40.052 , or 43.43.310 as those statutes existed before July 1, 1987, and as those statutes exist on and after July 28, 1991.
(b)Persons whose dissolution orders as defined in RCW 41.50.500
(3)were entered between July 1, 1987, and July 28, 1991, shall be entitled to receive direct payments of retirement benefits to satisfy court-ordered property divisions if the dissolution orders filed with the department comply or are amended to comply with RCW 41.50.670 through 41.50.720 and, as applicable, RCW 2.10.180 , 2.12.090 , ** 41.26.180 , 41.32.052 , 41.40.052 , or 43.43.310 .
[ 1991 c 365 s 24 ; 1987 c 326 s 26 .]
Notes:
Reviser's note: *(1) RCW 41.04.310 , 41.04.320 , and 41.04.330 were repealed by 1987 c 326 s 21, effective July 1, 1987.
**(2) RCW 41.26.180 was recodified as RCW 41.26.053 pursuant to 1994 c 298 s 5 .
Severability — 1991 c 365: See note following RCW 41.50.500 .
Effective date — 1987 c 326: See RCW 41.50.901 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.