Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 23B — Washington Business Corporation Act · Chapter 23B.14

RCW 23B.14.020

513 words·~2 min read·/wa/title-23b/chapter-23b-14/23b-14-020·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)A corporation's board of directors may propose dissolution for submission to the shareholders.
(2)For a proposal to dissolve to be approved:
(a)The board of directors must recommend dissolution to the shareholders unless
(i)the board of directors determines that because of conflict of interest or other special circumstances it should make no recommendation or
(ii)RCW 23B.08.245 applies, and in either case the board of directors communicates the basis for so proceeding to the shareholders; and
(b)The shareholders entitled to vote must approve the proposal to dissolve as provided in subsection
(5)of this section.
(3)The board of directors may condition its submission of the proposal for dissolution on any basis, including the affirmative vote of holders of a specified percentage of shares held by any group of shareholders not otherwise entitled under this title or the articles of incorporation to vote as a separate voting group on the proposed dissolution.
(4)The corporation shall notify each shareholder, whether or not entitled to vote, of the proposed dissolution either
(a)by giving notice of a shareholders' meeting in accordance with RCW 23B.07.050 and stating that the purpose or one of the purposes of the meeting is to consider dissolving the corporation, or
(b)in accordance with the requirements of RCW 23B.07.040 for approving the proposed dissolution without a meeting.
(5)(a) With respect to a corporation formed before August 1, 2024:
(i)Unless the articles of incorporation, or the board of directors acting in accordance with subsection
(3)of this section, requires a different vote, shareholder approval of the proposed dissolution requires:
(A)The approval of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the proposed dissolution; and
(B)The approval of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the proposed dissolution by each other voting group entitled under the articles of incorporation to vote separately on the proposed dissolution.
(ii)The articles of incorporation may require a different vote than that provided in this subsection (5)(a), or a different vote by separate voting groups, so long as the required vote is not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the proposed dissolution and of each other voting group entitled to vote separately on the proposed dissolution.
(b)With respect to a corporation formed on or after August 1, 2024, unless the articles of incorporation, or the board of directors acting in accordance with subsection
(3)of this section, requires a greater vote, shareholder approval of the proposed dissolution requires:
(i)The approval of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the proposed dissolution; and
(ii)The approval of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the proposed dissolution by each other voting group entitled under the articles of incorporation to vote separately on the proposed dissolution.
[ 2025 c 4 s 5 ; 2011 c 328 s 8 ; 2009 c 189 s 50 ; 2006 c 52 s 6 ; 2003 c 35 s 10 ; 1989 c 165 s 155 .]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.