Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Washington · Title 19 — Business Regulations—Miscellaneous · Chapter 19.85

RCW 19.85.040

485 words·~2 min read·/wa/title-19/chapter-19-85/19-85-040·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)A small business economic impact statement must include a brief description of the reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, and the kinds of professional services that a small business is likely to need in order to comply with such requirements. It shall analyze the costs of compliance for businesses required to comply with the proposed rule adopted pursuant to RCW 34.05.320 , including costs of equipment, supplies, labor, professional services, and increased administrative costs. It shall consider, based on input received, whether compliance with the rule will cause businesses to lose sales or revenue. To determine whether the proposed rule will have a disproportionate cost impact on small businesses, the impact statement must compare the cost of compliance for small business with the cost of compliance for the ten percent of businesses that are the largest businesses required to comply with the proposed rules using one or more of the following as a basis for comparing costs:
(a)Cost per employee;
(b)Cost per hour of labor; or
(c)Cost per one hundred dollars of sales.
(2)A small business economic impact statement must also include:
(a)A statement of the steps taken by the agency to reduce the costs of the rule on small businesses as required by RCW 19.85.030 (2), or reasonable justification for not doing so, addressing the options listed in RCW 19.85.030 (2);
(b)A description of how the agency will involve small businesses in the development of the rule;
(c)A list of industries that will be required to comply with the rule. However, this subsection (2)(c) shall not be construed to preclude application of the rule to any business or industry to which it would otherwise apply; and
(d)An estimate of the number of jobs that will be created or lost as the result of compliance with the proposed rule.
(3)To obtain information for purposes of this section, an agency may survey a representative sample of affected businesses or trade associations and should, whenever possible, appoint a committee under RCW 34.05.310
(2)to assist in the accurate assessment of the costs of a proposed rule, and the means to reduce the costs imposed on small business.
[ 2007 c 239 s 4 ; 1995 c 403 s 403 ; 1994 c 249 s 12 . Prior: 1989 c 374 s 3 ; 1989 c 175 s 73 ; 1982 c 6 s 4 .]
Notes:
Findings — 2007 c 239: See note following RCW 19.85.020 .
Application — 1995 c 403 ss 201, 301-305, 401-405, and 801: See note following RCW 34.05.328 .
Findings — Short title — Intent — 1995 c 403: See note following RCW 34.05.328 .
Severability — Application — 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310 .
Effective date — 1989 c 175: See note following RCW 34.05.010 .
Publication in Washington State Register: RCW 34.08.020 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.