RCW 10.64.110
245 words·~1 min read·
/wa/title-10/chapter-10-64/10-64-110·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(1)Following June 15, 1977, except as provided in subsection
(3)of this section, there shall be affixed to the original of every judgment and sentence of a felony conviction in every court in this state and every order adjudicating a juvenile to be a delinquent based upon conduct which would be a felony if committed by an adult, a fingerprint of the defendant or juvenile who is the subject of the order. When requested by the clerk of the court, the actual affixing of fingerprints shall be done by a representative of the office of the county sheriff.
(2)The clerk of the court shall attest that the fingerprints appearing on the judgment in sentence, order of adjudication of delinquency, or docket, is that of the individual who is the subject of the judgment or conviction, order, or docket entry.
(3)Amended judgment and sentences issued pursuant to State v. Blake , No. 96873-0 (Feb. 25, 2021), are exempt from the fingerprinting requirements in subsection
(1)of this section when there are no additional offenses of conviction from the original judgment and sentence and the defendant is in custody in a correctional facility. In such cases, the amended judgment and sentence shall reference the original judgment and sentence and the fingerprints affixed thereto.
[ 2021 c 311 s 20 ; 1977 ex.s. c 259 s 1 .]
Notes:
Effective date — 2021 c 311 ss 1-11 and 13-21: See note following RCW 71.24.115 .