Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Vermont · Title 9 — Commerce and Trade · Chapter 120

§ 4197.

582 words·~3 min read·/vt/title-9/chapter-120/4197

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§ 4197. Bad faith assertions of patent infringement
(a)A person shall not make a bad faith assertion of patent infringement.
(b)A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement:
(1)The demand letter does not contain the following information:
(A)the patent number;
(B)the name and address of the patent owner or owners and assignee or assignees, if any; and
(C)factual allegations concerning the specific areas in which the target’s products, services, and technology infringe the patent or are covered by the claims in the patent.
(2)Prior to sending the demand letter, the person fails to conduct an analysis comparing the claims in the patent to the target’s products, services, and technology, or such an analysis was done but does not identify specific areas in which the products, services, and technology are covered by the claims in the patent.
(3)The demand letter lacks the information described in subdivision
(1)of this subsection, the target requests the information, and the person fails to provide the information within a reasonable period of time.
(4)The demand letter demands payment of a license fee or response within an unreasonably short period of time.
(5)The person offers to license the patent for an amount that is not based on a reasonable estimate of the value of the license.
(6)The claim or assertion of patent infringement is meritless, and the person knew, or should have known, that the claim or assertion is meritless.
(7)The claim or assertion of patent infringement is deceptive.
(8)The person or its subsidiaries or affiliates have previously filed or threatened to file one or more lawsuits based on the same or similar claim of patent infringement, and:
(A)those threats or lawsuits lacked the information described in subdivision
(1)of this subsection; or
(B)the person attempted to enforce the claim of patent infringement in litigation, and a court found the claim to be meritless.
(9)Any other factor the court finds relevant.
(c)A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has not made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement:
(1)The demand letter contains the information described in subdivision (b)(1) of this section.
(2)Where the demand letter lacks the information described in subdivision (b)(1) of this section and the target requests the information, the person provides the information within a reasonable period of time.
(3)The person engages in a good faith effort to establish that the target has infringed the patent and to negotiate an appropriate remedy.
(4)The person makes a substantial investment in the use of the patent or in the production or sale of a product or item covered by the patent.
(5)The person is:
(A)the inventor or joint inventor of the patent or, in the case of a patent filed by and awarded to an assignee of the original inventor or joint inventor, is the original assignee; or
(B)an institution of higher education or a technology transfer organization owned or affiliated with an institution of higher education.
(6)The person has:
(A)demonstrated good faith business practices in previous efforts to enforce the patent, or a substantially similar patent; or
(B)successfully enforced the patent, or a substantially similar patent, through litigation.
(7)Any other factor the court finds relevant. (Added 2013, No. 44, § 6; 2013, No. 47, § 2, eff. May 24, 2013.)
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.