Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Vermont · Title 15 — Domestic Relations · Chapter 11

§ 659.

233 words·~1 min read·/vt/title-15/chapter-11/659

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§ 659. Child support order
(a)The total support obligation shall be presumed to be the amount of child support needed. Upon request of a party, the court shall consider the following factors in respect to both parents. If, after consideration of these factors, the court finds that application of the guidelines is unfair to the child or to any of the parties, the court may adjust the amount of child support:
(1)The financial resources of the child.
(2)The financial resources of the custodial parent.
(3)The standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marital relationship not been discontinued.
(4)The physical and emotional condition of the child.
(5)The educational needs of the child.
(6)The financial resources and needs of the noncustodial parent.
(7)Inflation.
(8)The costs of meeting the educational needs of either parent, if the costs are incurred for the purpose of increasing the earning capacity of the parent.
(9)Extraordinary travel and other travel-related expenses incurred in exercising the right to parent-child contact.
(10)Any other factors the court finds relevant.
(b)If the parties agree, the court may include in the child support order an additional amount designated for the purpose of providing for postsecondary education. (Added 1985, No. 180 (Adj. Sess.), § 7, eff. April 1, 1987; amended 1989, No. 220 (Adj. Sess.), § 22; 1995, No. 59, § 6.)
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.