Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Virginia · Title 2.2 · Chapter 37

Code of Virginia § 2.2-3714. Violations and penalties.

485 words·~2 min read·/va/title-2-2/chapter-37/2-2-3714·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A. In a proceeding commenced against any officer, employee, or member of a public body under § 2.2-3713 for a violation of § 2.2-3704 , 2.2-3705.1 through 2.2-3705.7 , 2.2-3706 , 2.2-3706.1 , 2.2-3707 , 2.2-3708.2 , 2.2-3708.3 , 2.2-3710 , 2.2-3711 , or 2.2-3712 , the court, if it finds that a violation was willfully and knowingly made, shall impose upon such officer, employee, or member in his individual capacity, whether a writ of mandamus or injunctive relief is awarded or not, a civil penalty of not less than $500 nor more than $2,000, which amount shall be paid into the Literary Fund.
For a second or subsequent violation, such civil penalty shall be not less than $2,000 nor more than $5,000.
B. In addition to any penalties imposed pursuant to subsection A, if the court finds that any officer, employee, or member of a public body failed to provide public records to a requester in accordance with the provisions of this chapter because such officer, employee, or member altered or destroyed the requested public records with the intent to avoid the provisions of this chapter with respect to such request prior to the expiration of the applicable record retention period set by the retention regulations promulgated pursuant to the Virginia Public Records Act (§ 42.1-76 et seq.) by the State Library Board, the court may impose upon such officer, employee, or member in his individual capacity, whether or not a writ of mandamus or injunctive relief is awarded, a civil penalty of up to $100 per record altered or destroyed, which amount shall be paid into the Literary Fund.
C. In addition to any penalties imposed pursuant to subsections A and B, if the court finds that a public body voted to certify a closed meeting in accordance with subsection D of § 2.2-3712 and such certification was not in accordance with the requirements of clause
(i)or
(ii)of subsection D of § 2.2-3712 , the court may impose on the public body, whether or not a writ of mandamus or injunctive relief is awarded, a civil penalty of up to $1,000, which amount shall be paid into the Literary Fund. In determining whether a civil penalty is appropriate, the court shall consider mitigating factors, including reliance of members of the public body on
(i)opinions of the Attorney General,
(ii)court cases substantially supporting the rationale of the public body, and
(iii)published opinions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Advisory Council.
1976, c. 467, § 2.1-346.1; 1978, c. 826; 1984, c. 252; 1989, c. 358; 1996, c. 578 ; 1999, cc. 703 , 726 ; 2001, c. 844 ; 2003, c. 319 ; 2004, c. 690 ; 2008, cc. 233 , 789 ; 2011, c. 327 ; 2017, c. 778 ; 2018, c. 55 ; 2019, c. 843 ; 2021, Sp. Sess. I, c. 483 ; 2022, c. 597 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.