Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 78B — Judicial Code · Chapter 4

78B-4-702. Affirmative defense for a breach of system security.

574 words·~3 min read·/ut/title-78b/chapter-4/78b-4-702

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 5/5/2021
78B-4-702. Affirmative defense for a breach of system security.
(1)A person that creates, maintains, and reasonably complies with a written cybersecurity program that meets the requirements of Subsection
(4), and is in place at the time of a breach of system security of the person, has an affirmative defense to a claim that:
(a)is brought under the laws of this state or in the courts of this state; and
(b)alleges that the person failed to implement reasonable information security controls that resulted in the breach of system security.
(2)A person has an affirmative defense to a claim that the person failed to appropriately respond to a breach of system security if:
(a)the person creates, maintains, and reasonably complies with a written cybersecurity program that meets the requirements of Subsection
(4)and is in place at the time of the breach of system security; and
(b)the written cybersecurity program had protocols at the time of the breach of system security for responding to a breach of system security that reasonably complied with the written cybersecurity program under Subsection (2)(a) and the person followed the protocols.
(3)A person has an affirmative defense to a claim that the person failed to appropriately notify an individual whose personal information was compromised in a breach of system security if:
(a)the person creates, maintains, and reasonably complies with a written cybersecurity program that meets the requirements of Subsection
(4)and is in place at the time of the breach of system security; and
(b)the written cybersecurity program had protocols at the time of the breach of system security for notifying an individual about a breach of system security that reasonably complied with the requirements for a written cybersecurity program under Subsection (3)(a) and the person followed the protocols.
(4)A written cybersecurity program described in Subsections
(1),
(2), and
(3)shall provide administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect personal information, including:
(a)being designed to:
(i)protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of personal information;
(ii)protect against any anticipated threat or hazard to the security, confidentiality, or integrity of personal information; and
(iii)protect against a breach of system security;
(b)reasonably conforming to a recognized cybersecurity framework as described in Subsection 78B-4-703(1) ; and
(c)being of an appropriate scale and scope in light of the following factors:
(i)the size and complexity of the person;
(ii)the nature and scope of the activities of the person;
(iii)the sensitivity of the information to be protected;
(iv)the cost and availability of tools to improve information security and reduce vulnerability; and
(v)the resources available to the person.
(a)Subject to Subsection (5)(b) , a person may not claim an affirmative defense under Subsection
(1),
(2), or
(3)if:
(i)the person had actual notice of a threat or hazard to the security, confidentiality, or integrity of personal information;
(ii)the person did not act in a reasonable amount of time to take known remedial efforts to protect the personal information against the threat or hazard; and
(iii)the threat or hazard resulted in the breach of system security.
(b)A risk assessment to improve the security, confidentiality, or integrity of personal information is not an actual notice of a threat or hazard to the security, confidentiality, or integrity of personal information.
Enacted by Chapter 40 , 2021 General Session
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.