Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 78B — Judicial Code · Chapter 4

78B-4-1002. Affirmative defense -- Reliance on governmental authorization -- Civil actions.

341 words·~2 min read·/ut/title-78b/chapter-4/78b-4-1002

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 5/6/2026
78B-4-1002. Affirmative defense -- Reliance on governmental authorization -- Civil actions.
(1)Except as provided in Subsection
(2)or (3)(c) , a person has an affirmative defense in a civil action if:
(a)the conduct, omission, or condition alleged to have caused the plaintiff harm was authorized or required by:
(i)statute;
(ii)ordinance;
(iii)administrative rule;
(iv)a permit, license, or order; or
(v)another written instrument that has the force of law and is issued by a governmental entity; and
(b)the authorization or requirement described in Subsection (1)(a) was in effect at the time the conduct, omission, or condition occurred, which is:
(i)for conduct, when the conduct is undertaken;
(ii)for an omission, when the omission occurs; and
(iii)for a condition, when the condition initially arises.
(2)The affirmative defense described in Subsection
(1)does not apply if the plaintiff proves that the governmental entity that issued the authorization or requirement described in Subsection
(1)has determined that:
(a)the person materially failed to comply with the terms or conditions of the authorization or requirement;
(b)the person's conduct exceeded the scope of the authorization or requirement; or
(c)the person procured the authorization or requirement by fraud.
(3)This section does not:
(a)create a cause of action;
(b)affect the availability of another defense in a civil action;
(c)apply to a products liability action; or
(d)abrogate, eliminate, or reduce any common law or statutory duty to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances.
(4)Subject to Subsections
(2)and
(3), the affirmative defense described in this section applies to a civil action regardless of the theory of liability on which the action is based.
(5)This section abrogates the common law to the extent the common law is inconsistent with this section.
(6)If any provision of this section is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect any other provision of this section that can be given effect without the invalid provision.
Enacted by Chapter 132 , 2026 General Session
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.