Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 76 — Utah Criminal Code · Chapter 6

76-6-414. Theft resulting in economic interruption.

366 words·~2 min read·/ut/title-76/chapter-6/76-6-414

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 5/7/2025
76-6-414. Theft resulting in economic interruption.
(a)As used in this section:
(i)"Business" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113 .
(ii)"Governmental entity" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113 .
(iii)"Economic interruption" means the same as that term is defined in Section 76-6-113 .
(b)Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5 and 76-6-401 apply to this section.
(2)An actor commits theft resulting in economic interruption if:
(a)the actor intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently obtains or exercises unauthorized control over a business's or governmental entity's property with the intent to deprive the business or governmental entity of the property; and
(b)the actor's actions under Subsection (2)(a) cause an economic interruption for the business or governmental entity.
(a)Except as provided in Subsection (3)(b) or (c), a violation of Subsection
(2)is a class A misdemeanor.
(b)Except as provided in Subsection (3)(c) , a violation of Subsection
(2)is a third degree felony if the actor has two prior convictions for a violation of Subsection
(2)within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most recent violation of Subsection (2).
(c)A violation of Subsection
(2)is a second degree felony if the actor has at least three prior convictions for a violation of Subsection
(2)within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most recent violation of Subsection
(2).
(4)It is not a defense under this section that the actor did not know that the victim is a business or governmental entity.
(5)A prior conviction used for a penalty enhancement under Subsection (3)(b) or
(c)is a conviction that is from a separate criminal episode than:
(a)the most recent violation of Subsection (2); and
(b)any other prior conviction that is used to enhance the penalty for the most recent violation of Subsection (2).
(6)The prosecuting attorney, or the grand jury if an indictment is returned, shall include notice in the information or indictment that the offense is subject to an enhancement under Subsection (3)(b) or (c).
Amended by Chapter 173 , 2025 General Session
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.