Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 76 — Utah Criminal Code · Chapter 6

76-6-113. Property damage resulting in economic interruption -- Enhanced penalties.

447 words·~2 min read·/ut/title-76/chapter-6/76-6-113

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 5/6/2026
76-6-113. Property damage resulting in economic interruption -- Enhanced penalties.
(a)As used in this section:
(i)"Business" means an enterprise carried on for the purpose of gain or economic profit.
(ii)"Governmental entity" means the state, a county, a municipality, a special district, a special service district, a school district, a state institution of higher education, or any other political subdivision or administrative unit of the state.
(iii)"Economic interruption" means any disruption or cessation to the operations of a business or governmental entity that results in:
(A)the business or governmental entity ceasing operations for at least one day; or
(B)the employees of the business or governmental entity being unable to perform labor for the business or governmental entity for at least one day.
(iv)"Private postsecondary educational institution" means the same as that term is defined in Section 53H-1-101 .
(b)Terms defined in Sections 76-1-101.5 and 76-6-101 apply to this section.
(2)An actor commits property damage resulting in economic interruption if:
(a)the actor intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently damages, defaces, or destroys a business's, private postsecondary educational institution's, or governmental entity's property; and
(b)the actor's actions under Subsection (2)(a) cause an economic interruption for the business, private postsecondary educational institution, or governmental entity.
(3)A violation of Subsection
(2)is a class A misdemeanor.
(4)It is not a defense under this section that the actor did not know that the victim is a business, private postsecondary educational institution, or governmental entity.
(5)If the trier of facts finds that the actor committed a violation of Subsection
(2), the actor is guilty of:
(a)a third degree felony if the actor has two prior convictions for a violation of Subsection
(2)within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most recent violation of Subsection
(2); and
(b)a second degree felony if the actor has at least three prior convictions for a violation of Subsection
(2)within five years before the day on which the actor committed the most recent violation of Subsection
(2).
(6)A prior conviction used for a penalty enhancement under Subsection
(5)is a conviction that is from a separate criminal episode than:
(a)the most recent violation of Subsection
(2); and
(b)any other prior conviction that is used to enhance the penalty for the most recent violation of Subsection
(2).
(7)The prosecuting attorney, or the grand jury if an indictment is returned, shall include notice in the information or indictment that the offense is subject to an enhancement under Subsection
(5).
Amended by Chapter 183 , 2026 General Session
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.