Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 67 — State Officers and Employees · Chapter 21

67-21-4. Choice of forum -- Remedies for employee bringing action -- Proof required.

615 words·~3 min read·/ut/title-67/chapter-21/67-21-4

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 10/14/2025
67-21-4. Choice of forum -- Remedies for employee bringing action -- Proof required.
(a)Except as provided in Subsection (1)(b) or
(d), and subject to Subsections (1)(d) through
(e), an employee who alleges a violation of this chapter may bring a civil action for appropriate injunctive relief, damages, or both, within 180 days after the occurrence of the alleged violation of this chapter.
(b)Except as provided in Subsection (1)(d) :
(i)an employee of a political subdivision that has adopted an ordinance described in Section 67-21-3.6 :
(A)may bring a civil action described in Subsection (1)(a) within 180 days after the day on which the employee has exhausted administrative remedies; and
(B)may not bring a civil action described in Subsection (1)(a) until the employee has exhausted administrative remedies; and
(ii)an employee of an institution of higher education:
(A)may bring a civil action described in Subsection (1)(a) within 180 days after the day on which the employee has exhausted administrative remedies; and
(B)may not bring a civil action described in Subsection (1)(a) until the employee has exhausted administrative remedies.
(c)Except as provided in Subsection (1)(d) , a public entity employee who is not a legislative employee or a judicial employee may bring a claim of retaliatory action by selecting one of the following methods:
(i)filing a grievance with the Career Service Review Office in accordance with Section 67-19a-402.5 ; or
(ii)bringing a civil action for appropriate injunctive relief, damages, or both, within 180 days after the occurrence of the alleged violation of this chapter.
(i)A claimant may bring an action after the 180-day limit described in this Subsection
(1)if:
(A)the claimant originally brought the action within the 180-day time limit;
(B)the action described in Subsection (1)(d)(i)(A) failed or was dismissed for a reason other than on the merits; and
(C)the claimant brings the new action within 180 days after the day on which the claimant originally brought the action under Subsection (1)(d)(i)(A) .
(ii)A claimant may commence a new action under this Subsection (1)(d) only once.
(e)A public entity employee who files a grievance under Subsection (1)(d)(i) :
(i)may not, at any time, bring a civil action in relation to the subject matter of the grievance;
(ii)may seek a remedy described in Subsection 67-21-3.5(2) ; and
(iii)waives the right to seek a remedy or a type of damages not included in Subsection 67-21-3.5(2) .
(f)A public entity employee who files a civil action under Subsection (1)(d)(ii) may not, at any time, file a grievance with the Career Service Review Office in relation to the subject matter of the civil action.
(2)An employee who brings a civil action under this section shall bring the action in the district court for the county where the alleged violation occurred, the county where the complainant resides, or the county where the person against whom the civil complaint is filed resides or has the person's principal place of business.
(a)An employee who brings an action under this section has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the employee, in good faith, engaged in protected reporting and suffered a retaliatory action.
(b)If the employee satisfies the burden described in Subsection (3)(a) , the employer has the burden of proving by substantial evidence that the employer's action was justified.
(c)If the employer satisfies the burden described in Subsection (3)(b) , the employee has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the employer's justification is pretextual.
Amended by Chapter 9 , 2025 Special Session 1
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.