Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 63A — Utah Government Operations Code · Chapter 15

63A-15-701. Commission review of ethics violation.

535 words·~2 min read·/ut/title-63a/chapter-15/63a-15-701·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 11/6/2025
63A-15-701. Commission review of ethics violation.
(1)The scope of a review by the commission is limited to an alleged ethics violation stated in a complaint that has not been previously dismissed under Section 63A-15-602 .
(a)Before holding the meeting for review of the complaint, the commission chair may schedule a separate meeting of the commission for the purposes of:
(i)hearing motions or arguments from the parties, including hearing motions or arguments relating to dismissal of a complaint, admission of evidence, or procedures;
(ii)holding a vote of the commission, with or without the attendance of the parties, on procedural or commission business matters relating to a complaint; or
(iii)reviewing a complaint, with or without the attendance of the parties, to determine if the complaint should be dismissed in whole or in part, by means of a majority vote of the commission, because the complaint pleads facts or circumstances against a political subdivision officer or employee that have already been reviewed by, as provided in Section 63A-15-301 , the commission, a municipal ethics commission established in accordance with Section 10-3-1311 , a county ethics commission established in accordance with Section 17-70-511 , or a local political subdivision ethics commission established in accordance with Section 63A-15-103 .
(b)Notwithstanding Section 63A-15-603 , the commission may, by a majority vote, change the date of the meeting for review of the complaint in order to accommodate:
(i)a meeting authorized under Subsection (2)(a) ; or
(ii)necessary scheduling requirements.
(a)The commission shall comply with the Utah Rules of Evidence except where the commission determines, by majority vote, that a rule is not compatible with the requirements of this chapter.
(b)The chair shall make rulings on admissibility of evidence consistent with the provisions of Section 63A-15-402 .
(a)A meeting or hearing authorized in this part is open to the public except as provided in Section 52-4-204 .
(b)The following individuals may be present during the presentation of testimony and evidence to the commission:
(i)the complainant;
(ii)the complainant's counsel, if applicable;
(iii)the respondent;
(iv)the respondent's counsel, if applicable;
(v)members of the commission;
(vi)staff to the commission;
(vii)a witness, while testifying before the commission; and
(viii)necessary security personnel.
(c)The commission may, in accordance with Section 52-4-204 , close a meeting to:
(i)seek or obtain legal advice on legal, evidentiary, or procedural matters; or
(ii)conduct deliberations to reach a decision on the complaint.
(5)If a majority of the commission determines that a continuance is necessary to obtain further evidence and testimony, to accommodate administrative needs, or to accommodate the attendance of commission members, witnesses, or a party, the commission shall:
(a)adjourn and continue the meeting to a future date and time after notice to the parties; and
(b)establish that future date and time by majority vote.
(6)A record, as defined in Section 63G-2-103 , created by the commission under this part, reviewed by the commission under this part, or received by the commission under this part, is a public record, as defined in Section 63G-2-103 .
Amended by Chapter 17 , 2025 Special Session 1
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.