Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 26B — Utah Health and Human Services Code · Chapter 4

26B-4-207. Nondiscrimination for medical care or government employment -- Notice to prospective and current public employees -- No effect on private employers.

475 words·~2 min read·/ut/title-26b/chapter-4/26b-4-207·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 5/1/2024
26B-4-207. Nondiscrimination for medical care or government employment -- Notice to prospective and current public employees -- No effect on private employers.
(1)For purposes of medical care, including an organ or tissue transplant, a patient's use, in accordance with this part, of cannabis in a medicinal dosage form or a cannabis product in a medicinal dosage form:
(a)is considered the equivalent of the authorized use of any other medication used at the discretion of a physician; and
(b)does not constitute the use of an illicit substance or otherwise disqualify an individual from needed medical care.
(i)A state employer or a political subdivision employer shall take the action described in Subsection (2)(a)(ii) before:
(A)giving to a current employee an assignment or duty that arises from or directly relates to an obligation under this part; or
(B)hiring a prospective employee whose assignments or duties would include an assignment or duty that arises from or directly relates to an obligation under this part.
(ii)The employer described in Subsection (2)(a)(i) shall give the employee or prospective employee described in Subsection (2)(a)(i) a written notice that notifies the employee or prospective employee:
(A)that the employee's or prospective employee's job duties may require the employee or prospective employee to engage in conduct which is in violation of the criminal laws of the United States; and
(B)that in accepting a job or undertaking a duty described in Subsection (2)(a)(i), although the employee or prospective employee is entitled to the protections of Title 67, Chapter 21, Utah Protection of Public Employees Act, the employee may not object or refuse to carry out an assignment or duty that may be a violation of the criminal laws of the United States with respect to the manufacture, sale, or distribution of cannabis.
(b)The Division of Human Resource Management shall create, revise, and publish the form of the notice described in Subsection (2)(a).
(c)Notwithstanding Subsection 67-21-3 (3), an employee who has signed the notice described in Subsection (2)(a) may not:
(i)claim in good faith that the employee's actions violate or potentially violate the laws of the United States with respect to the manufacture, sale, or distribution of cannabis; or
(ii)refuse to carry out a directive that the employee reasonably believes violates the criminal laws of the United States with respect to the manufacture, sale, or distribution of cannabis.
(d)An employer may not take retaliatory action as defined in Section 67-19a-101 against a current employee who refuses to sign the notice described in Subsection (2)(a).
(3)Nothing in this section requires a private employer to accommodate the use of medical cannabis or affects the ability of a private employer to have policies restricting the use of medical cannabis by applicants or employees.
Amended by Chapter 217 , 2024 General Session
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.