Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Utah · Title 17 — Counties · Chapter 79

17-79-812.

769 words·~3 min read·/ut/title-17/chapter-79/17-79-812·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Effective 5/6/2026
17-79-812. Exactions -- Requirement to offer to original owner property acquired by exaction -- Exaction for right-of-way improvements -- Improvement completion assurance requirements.
(1)A county may impose an exaction or exactions on development proposed in a land use application, including, subject to Section 17-79-813 , an exaction for a water interest, if:
(a)an essential link exists between a legitimate governmental interest and each exaction; and
(b)each exaction is roughly proportionate, both in nature and extent, to the impact of the proposed development.
(2)If a land use authority imposes an exaction for another governmental entity:
(a)the governmental entity shall request the exaction; and
(b)the land use authority shall transfer the exaction to the governmental entity for which it was exacted.
(a)If a county plans to dispose of surplus real property under Section 17-78-103 that was acquired under this section and has been owned by the county for less than 15 years, the county shall first offer to reconvey the property, without receiving additional consideration, to the person who granted the property to the county.
(b)A person to whom a county offers to reconvey property under Subsection (3)(a) has 90 days to accept or reject the county's offer.
(c)If a person to whom a county offers to reconvey property declines the offer, the county may offer the property for sale in accordance with the requirements of Title 11, Chapter 1, Part 2, Disposal of Public Property.
(d)Subsection (3)(a) does not apply to the disposal of property acquired by exaction by a community development or urban renewal agency.
(a)A county may not, as part of an infrastructure improvement, require the installation of pavement on a residential roadway at a width in excess of 32 feet.
(b)Subsection (4)(a) does not apply if a county requires the installation of pavement in excess of 32 feet:
(i)in a vehicle turnaround area;
(ii)in a cul-de-sac;
(iii)to address specific traffic flow constraints at an intersection, mid-block crossings, or other areas;
(iv)to address an applicable general or master plan improvement, including transportation, bicycle lanes, trails, or other similar improvements that are not included within an impact fee area;
(v)to address traffic flow constraints for service to or abutting higher density developments or uses that generate higher traffic volumes, including community centers, schools, and other similar uses;
(vi)as needed for the installation or location of a utility which is maintained by the county and is considered a transmission line or requires additional roadway width;
(vii)for third-party utility lines that have an easement preventing the installation of utilities maintained by the county within the roadway;
(viii)for utilities over 12 feet in depth;
(ix)for roadways with a design speed that exceeds 25 miles per hour;
(x)as needed for flood and stormwater routing;
(xi)as needed to meet fire code requirements for parking and hydrants; or
(xii)as needed to accommodate street parking.
(c)Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent a county from approving a road cross section with a pavement width less than 32 feet.
(i)A land use applicant may appeal a municipal requirement for pavement in excess of 32 feet on a residential roadway.
(ii)A land use applicant that has appealed a municipal specification for a residential roadway pavement width in excess of 32 feet may request that the county assemble a panel of qualified experts to serve as the appeal authority for purposes of determining the technical aspects of the appeal.
(iii)Unless otherwise agreed by the applicant and the county, the panel described in Subsection (4)(d)(ii) shall consist of the following three experts:
(A)one licensed engineer, designated by the county;
(B)one licensed engineer, designated by the land use applicant; and
(C)one licensed engineer, agreed upon and designated by the two designated engineers under Subsections (4)(d)(iii)(A) and
(B).
(iv)A member of the panel assembled by the county under Subsection (4)(d)(ii) may not have an interest in the application that is the subject of the appeal.
(v)The land use applicant shall pay:
(A)50% of the cost of the panel; and
(B)the county's published appeal fee.
(vi)The decision of the panel is a final decision, subject to a petition for review under Subsection (4)(d)(vii).
(vii)In accordance with Section 17-79-1009 , a land use applicant or the county may file a petition for review of the decision with the district court within 30 days after the date that the decision is final.
Amended by Chapter 210 , 2026 General Session
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.