Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 9 - ARBITRATION · CHAPTER 1— GENERAL PROVISIONS · § 10

§ 10. Same; vacation; grounds; rehearing

533 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-9/section-10

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In any of the following cases the United States court in and for the district wherein the award was made may make an order vacating the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration—
(1)where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means;
(2)where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them;
(3)where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or
(4)where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.
(b)If an award is vacated and the time within which the agreement required the award to be made has not expired, the court may, in its discretion, direct a rehearing by the arbitrators.
(c)The United States district court for the district wherein an award was made that was issued pursuant to section 580 of title 5 may make an order vacating the award upon the application of a person, other than a party to the arbitration, who is adversely affected or aggrieved by the award, if the use of arbitration or the award is clearly inconsistent with the factors set forth in section 572 of title 5.
(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 672; Pub. L. 101–552, § 5, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2745; Pub. L. 102–354, § 5(b)(4), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 946; Pub. L. 107–169, § 1, May 7, 2002, 116 Stat. 132.)
Derivation
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, § 10, 43 Stat. 885.
Connections33 cite this · traces to 2
15 references not yet in our index
  • July 30, 1947, ch. 392
  • 61 Stat. 672
  • Pub. L. 101–552, § 5
  • 104 Stat. 2745
  • Pub. L. 102–354, § 5(b)(4)
  • 106 Stat. 946
  • Pub. L. 107–169, § 1
  • 116 Stat. 132
  • Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, § 10
  • 43 Stat. 885
  • Pub. L. 107–169, § 1(1)
  • Pub. L. 107–169, § 1(5)
  • Pub. L. 107–169, § 1(4)
  • Pub. L. 102–354
  • Pub. L. 101–552
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 10
Same; vacation; grounds; rehearing
Fed. Reg.×27
U.S.C.×6
ActJuly 30, 1947, ch. 392
Stat.61 Stat. 672
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101–552, § 5
Stat.104 Stat. 2745
Pub. L.Pub. L. 102–354, § 5(b)(4)
Cites 17 · showing 7Cited by 33 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.