Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 5 - GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES · CHAPTER 61— HOURS OF WORK · SUBCHAPTER II— FLEXIBLE AND COMPRESSED WORK SCHEDULES · § 6131

§ 6131. Criteria and review

493 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-5/section-6131

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this subchapter or any collective bargaining agreement and subject to subsection
(c)of this section, if the head of an agency finds that a particular flexible or compressed schedule under this subchapter has had or would have an adverse agency impact, the agency shall promptly determine not to—
(1)establish such schedule; or
(2)continue such schedule, if the schedule has already been established.
(b)For purposes of this section, “adverse agency impact” means—
(1)a reduction of the productivity of the agency;
(2)a diminished level of services furnished to the public by the agency; or
(3)an increase in the cost of agency operations (other than a reasonable administrative cost relating to the process of establishing a flexible or compressed schedule).
(1)This subsection shall apply in the case of any schedule covering employees in a unit represented by an exclusive representative.
(A)If an agency and an exclusive representative reach an impasse in collective bargaining with respect to an agency determination under subsection (a)(1) not to establish a flexible or compressed schedule, the impasse shall be presented to the Federal Service Impasses Panel (hereinafter in this section referred to as the “Panel”).
(B)The Panel shall promptly consider any case presented under subparagraph (A), and shall take final action in favor of the agency’s determination if the finding on which it is based is supported by evidence that the schedule is likely to cause an adverse agency impact.
(A)If an agency and an exclusive representative have entered into a collective bargaining agreement providing for use of a flexible or compressed schedule under this subchapter and the head of the agency determines under subsection (a)(2) to terminate a flexible or compressed schedule, the agency may reopen the agreement to seek termination of the schedule involved.
(B)If the agency and exclusive representative reach an impasse in collective bargaining with respect to terminating such schedule, the impasse shall be presented to the Panel.
(C)The Panel shall promptly consider any case presented under subparagraph (B), and shall rule on such impasse not later than 60 days after the date the Panel is presented the impasse. The Panel shall take final action in favor of the agency’s determination to terminate a schedule if the finding on which the determination is based is supported by evidence that the schedule has caused an adverse agency impact.
(D)Any such schedule may not be terminated until—
(i)the agreement covering such schedule is renegotiated or expires or terminates pursuant to the terms of that agreement; or
(ii)the date of the Panel’s final decision, if an impasse arose in the reopening of the agreement under subparagraph
(A)of this paragraph.
(d)This section shall not apply with respect to flexible schedules that may be established without regard to the authority provided under this subchapter.
(Added Pub. L. 97–221, § 2(a)(2), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 231.)
Connections5 cite this
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 97–221, § 2(a)(2)
  • 96 Stat. 231
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 6131
Criteria and review
Fed. Reg.×5
Pub. L.Pub. L. 97–221, § 2(a)(2)
Stat.96 Stat. 231
Cites 2Cited by 5 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.