Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 49 - TRANSPORTATION · CHAPTER 601— SAFETY · § 60119

§ 60119. Judicial review

717 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-49/section-60119

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Review of Regulations, Orders, and Other Final Agency Actions.—
(1)Except as provided in subsection
(b)of this section, a person adversely affected by a regulation prescribed under this chapter or an order issued under this chapter may apply for review of the regulation or order by filing a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit or in the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which the person resides or has its principal place of business. The petition must be filed not later than 89 days after the regulation is prescribed or order is issued. The clerk of the court immediately shall send a copy of the petition to the Secretary of Transportation.
(2)A judgment of a court under paragraph
(1)of this subsection may be reviewed only by the Supreme Court under section 1254 of title 28. A remedy under paragraph
(1)is in addition to any other remedies provided by law.
(3)A judicial review of agency action under this section shall apply the standards of review established in section 706 of title 5.
(b)Review of Financial Responsibility Orders.—
(1)A person adversely affected by an order issued under section 60111 of this title may apply for review of the order by filing a petition for review in the appropriate court of appeals of the United States. The petition must be filed not later than 60 days after the order is issued. Findings of fact the Secretary makes are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence.
(2)A judgment of a court under paragraph
(1)of this subsection may be reviewed only by the Supreme Court under section 1254(1) of title 28.
(Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1323; Pub. L. 112–90, §§ 2(d), 20(b), Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1905, 1917.)
In this section, the word “judicial” is omitted as surplus.
In subsection (a)(1), the words “Except as provided in subsection
(b)of this section” are added for clarity. The words “who is or will be . . . or aggrieved” are omitted as surplus. The word “prescribed” is added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The word “Circuit” is added to complete the proper title of the Court. The word “resides” is substituted for “located” for clarity and for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code. The words “or other officer designated by him for that purpose” are omitted as surplus because of 49:322(b).
In subsection (a)(2), the text of 49 App.:1675(b) and 2005(b) is omitted as surplus because of 28:1331 and because 5:ch. 7 applies in the absence of an exception. The text of 49 App.:1675(d) and 2005(d) is omitted as covered by rule 43 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.). The words “affirming or setting aside, in whole or in part, any such regulation or order of the Secretary” are omitted as surplus. The words “may be reviewed only” are substituted for “shall be final, subject to review” for consistency. The words “and not in substitution for” are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(1), the words “adversely affected” are substituted for “aggrieved” for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code. The word “only” is omitted as surplus. The text of 49 App.:1674b(b)(4)(B) (1st sentence) is omitted as surplus because 28:2112 applies in the absence of an exception. The text of 49 App.:1674b(b)(4)(B) (2d sentence) is omitted as surplus and because of 28:1651.
In subsection (b)(2), the words “and decree” are omitted as surplus. The words “may be reviewed only” are substituted for “shall be final, except that such judgment and decree shall be subject to review” for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words “upon certiorari” are omitted as surplus because of 28:1254(1).
Connections9 cite this · traces to 3
7 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e)
  • 108 Stat. 1323
  • Pub. L. 112–90
  • 125 Stat. 1905
  • Pub. L. 112–90, § 2(d)(1)
  • Pub. L. 112–90, § 2(d)(2)
  • Pub. L. 112–90, § 20(b)
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 60119
Judicial review
Fed. Reg.×9
Pub. L.Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e)
Stat.108 Stat. 1323
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112–90
Stat.125 Stat. 1905
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112–90, § 2(d)(1)
Cites 10 · showing 8Cited by 9 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.