Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 49 - TRANSPORTATION · CHAPTER 475— NOISE · SUBCHAPTER I— NOISE ABATEMENT · § 47506

§ 47506. Limitations on recovering damages for noise

224 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-49/section-47506

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)General Limitations.— A person acquiring an interest in property after February 18, 1980, in an area surrounding an airport for which a noise exposure map has been submitted under section 47503 of this title and having actual or constructive knowledge of the existence of the map may recover damages for noise attributable to the airport only if, in addition to any other elements for recovery of damages, the person shows that—
(1)after acquiring the interest, there was a significant—
(A)change in the type or frequency of aircraft operations at the airport;
(B)change in the airport layout;
(C)change in flight patterns; or
(D)increase in nighttime operations; and
(2)the damages resulted from the change or increase.
(b)Constructive Knowledge.— Constructive knowledge of the existence of a map under subsection
(a)of this section shall be imputed, at a minimum, to a person if—
(1)before the person acquired the interest, notice of the existence of the map was published at least 3 times in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the property is located; or
(2)the person is given a copy of the map when acquiring the interest.
(Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1286.)
In subsection (a)(2), the words “for which recovery is sought have” are omitted as surplus.
Connections17 cite this · traces to 1
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.