Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 49 - TRANSPORTATION · CHAPTER 115— FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS · § 11501

§ 11501. Tax discrimination against rail transportation property

756 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-49/section-11501

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In this section—
(1)the term “assessment” means valuation for a property tax levied by a taxing district;
(2)the term “assessment jurisdiction” means a geographical area in a State used in determining the assessed value of property for ad valorem taxation;
(3)the term “rail transportation property” means property, as defined by the Board, owned or used by a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part; and
(4)the term “commercial and industrial property” means property, other than transportation property and land used primarily for agricultural purposes or timber growing, devoted to a commercial or industrial use and subject to a property tax levy.
(b)The following acts unreasonably burden and discriminate against interstate commerce, and a State, subdivision of a State, or authority acting for a State or subdivision of a State may not do any of them:
(1)Assess rail transportation property at a value that has a higher ratio to the true market value of the rail transportation property than the ratio that the assessed value of other commercial and industrial property in the same assessment jurisdiction has to the true market value of the other commercial and industrial property.
(2)Levy or collect a tax on an assessment that may not be made under paragraph
(1)of this subsection.
(3)Levy or collect an ad valorem property tax on rail transportation property at a tax rate that exceeds the tax rate applicable to commercial and industrial property in the same assessment jurisdiction.
(4)Impose another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part.
(c)Notwithstanding section 1341 of title 28 and without regard to the amount in controversy or citizenship of the parties, a district court of the United States has jurisdiction, concurrent with other jurisdiction of courts of the United States and the States, to prevent a violation of subsection
(b)of this section. Relief may be granted under this subsection only if the ratio of assessed value to true market value of rail transportation property exceeds by at least 5 percent the ratio of assessed value to true market value of other commercial and industrial property in the same assessment jurisdiction. The burden of proof in determining assessed value and true market value is governed by State law. If the ratio of the assessed value of other commercial and industrial property in the assessment jurisdiction to the true market value of all other commercial and industrial property cannot be determined to the satisfaction of the district court through the random-sampling method known as a sales assessment ratio study (to be carried out under statistical principles applicable to such a study), the court shall find, as a violation of this section—
(1)an assessment of the rail transportation property at a value that has a higher ratio to the true market value of the rail transportation property than the assessed value of all other property subject to a property tax levy in the assessment jurisdiction has to the true market value of all other commercial and industrial property; and
(2)the collection of an ad valorem property tax on the rail transportation property at a tax rate that exceeds the tax ratio rate applicable to taxable property in the taxing district.
(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, § 102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 843.)
Connections13 cite this · traces to 3
20 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104–88, title I, § 102(a)
  • 109 Stat. 843
  • section 11503 of this title
  • Pub. L. 104–88, § 102(a)
  • Pub. L. 95–473
  • 92 Stat. 1444
  • Pub. L. 96–448, title II, § 214(a)
  • 94 Stat. 1913
  • Pub. L. 97–261, § 17(a)
  • 96 Stat. 1117
  • Pub. L. 99–521, § 11(a)
  • 100 Stat. 2997
  • Pub. L. 103–272, § 4(j)(34)
  • 108 Stat. 1370
  • Pub. L. 103–305, title VI, § 601(c)
  • 108 Stat. 1606
  • Pub. L. 103–311, title II, § 211(b)(2)
  • 108 Stat. 1689
  • Pub. L. 104–88
  • section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 11501
Tax discrimination against rail transportation property
Bills×6
Stat.×4
U.S.C.×2
Fed. Reg.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–88, title I, § 102(a)
Stat.109 Stat. 843
Citesection 11503 of this title
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–88, § 102(a)
Pub. L.Pub. L. 95–473
Cites 23 · showing 8Cited by 13 across 4 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.