§ 7704. Dangerous drugs as grounds for revocation
505 words·~2 min read·
/usc/title-46/section-7704A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)If it is shown at a hearing under this chapter that a holder of a license, certificate of registry, or merchant mariner’s document issued under this part, within 10 years before the beginning of the proceedings, has been convicted of violating a dangerous drug law of the United States or of a State, the license, certificate, or document shall be suspended or revoked.
(b)If it is shown that a holder has been a user of, or addicted to, a dangerous drug, the license, certificate of registry, or merchant mariner’s document shall be revoked unless the holder provides satisfactory proof that the holder is cured.
(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 546; Pub. L. 99–36, § 1(a)(9)(F), (G), May 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 68; Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, § 4103(a)(2)(B), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 511; Pub. L. 108–293, title IV, § 402, Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1043; Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXV, § 3545(b), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2326.)
Section 7704 requires the Secretary to revoke the license, certificate, or document of any individual who has been convicted of a dangerous drug law within 10 years before the beginning of the suspension or revocation procedures. This section has expanded current law to incorporate violations involving “controlled substances” which are not narcotic. This includes PCP and LSD. Unless it can be done under existing law, the suspension or revocation of an individual’s license based on the use of a “controlled substance” only applies to the use or conviction after the date of enactment of this Act.
This section also provides that anyone who has been a user of or addicted to a dangerous drug since July 14, 1954, may be subjected to revocation procedures unless the individual provides satisfactory proof of being cured.
In sections 7503(b)(2) and 7704(c), the term “use”, when applying to “narcotic drugs” or “controlled substances”, is not intended to include the use of “off the shelf” drugs or drugs acquired with a prescription lawfully issued by a medical doctor, as long as the drugs are used by the individual in the recommended amounts and the drugs will not impair the individual’s ability to perform duties.
Connections11 cite this · traces to 2
Cited by 11 sections
register
- NoticesSixty-day notice requesting comments
- NoticesSixty-day notice requesting comments
- NoticesSixty-day notice requesting comments
- NoticesThirty-day notice requesting comments
- NoticesSixty-day notice requesting comments
- NoticesThirty-day notice requesting comments
- NoticesSixty-day notice requesting comments
- NoticesSixty-day notice requesting comments
- NoticesFinal rule
- NoticesThirty-day notice requesting comments
- Presidential DocumentsFinal rule
Traces to 2 documents
public-private-law
U.S. Code
13 references not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 98–89
- 97 Stat. 546
- Pub. L. 99–36, § 1(a)(9)(F)
- 99 Stat. 68
- Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, § 4103(a)(2)(B)
- 104 Stat. 511
- Pub. L. 108–293, title IV, § 402
- 118 Stat. 1043
- 132 Stat. 2326
- Pub. L. 108–293
- Pub. L. 101–380
- Pub. L. 99–36, § 1(a)(9)(G)
- section 1020 of Pub. L. 101–380
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 7704
Dangerous drugs as grounds for revocation
Fed. Reg.×11
Pub. L.Pub. L. 98–89
Stat.97 Stat. 546
Pub. L.Pub. L. 99–36, § 1(a)(9)(F)
Stat.99 Stat. 68
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, § 4103(a)(2)(B)
Cites 15 · showing 7Cited by 11 across 1 source