Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 42 - THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE · CHAPTER 6A— PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE · Part E— General Provisions · § 300j–7

§ 300j–7. Judicial review

980 words·~4 min read·/usc/title-42/section-300j-7

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A petition for review of— actions pertaining to the establishment of national primary drinking water regulations (including maximum contaminant level goals) may be filed only in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit; and any other final action of the Administrator under this chapter may be filed in the circuit in which the petitioner resides or transacts business which is directly affected by the action. Any such petition shall be filed within the 45-day period beginning on the date of the promulgation of the regulation or any other final Agency action with respect to which review is sought or on the date of the determination with respect to which review is sought, and may be filed after the expiration of such 45-day period if the petition is based solely on grounds arising after the expiration of such period.
Action of the Administrator with respect to which review could have been obtained under this subsection shall not be subject to judicial review in any civil or criminal proceeding for enforcement or in any civil action to enjoin enforcement. In any petition concerning the assessment of a civil penalty pursuant to section 300g–3(g)(3)(B) of this title , the petitioner shall simultaneously send a copy of the complaint by certified mail to the Administrator and the Attorney General.
The court shall set aside and remand the penalty order if the court finds that there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of a violation or that the assessment of the penalty by the Administrator constitutes an abuse of discretion. The United States district courts shall have jurisdiction of actions brought to review
(1)the granting of, or the refusing to grant, a variance or exemption under section 300g–4 or 300g–5 of this title or
(2)the requirements of any schedule prescribed for a variance or exemption under such section or the failure to prescribe such a schedule. Such an action may only be brought upon a petition for review filed with the court within the 45-day period beginning on the date the action sought to be reviewed is taken or, in the case of a petition to review the refusal to grant a variance or exemption or the failure to prescribe a schedule, within the 45-day period beginning on the date action is required to be taken on the variance, exemption, or schedule, as the case may be. A petition for such review may be filed after the expiration of such period if the petition is based solely on grounds arising after the expiration of such period. Action with respect to which review could have been obtained under this subsection shall not be subject to judicial review in any civil or criminal proceeding for enforcement or in any civil action to enjoin enforcement. In any judicial proceeding in which review is sought of a determination under this subchapter required to be made on the record after notice and opportunity for hearing, if any party applies to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence and shows to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence in the proceeding before the Administrator, the court may order such additional evidence (and evidence in rebuttal thereof) to be taken before the Administrator, in such manner and upon such term and conditions as the court may deem proper. The Administrator may modify his findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of the additional evidence so taken, and he shall file such modified or new findings, and his recommendation, if any, for the modification or setting aside of his original determination, with the return of such additional evidence. ( July 1, 1944, ch. 373 , title XIV, § 1448, as added Pub. L. 93–523, § 2(a) , Dec. 16, 1974 , 88 Stat. 1689 ; amended Pub. L. 99–339, title III, § 303 , June 19, 1986 , 100 Stat. 667 ; Pub. L. 104–182, title I, § 113(c) , Aug. 6, 1996 , 110 Stat. 1636 .)
Connections7 cite this
6 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 93-523
  • 88 Stat. 1689
  • Pub. L. 99-339
  • 100 Stat. 667
  • Pub. L. 104-182
  • 110 Stat. 1636
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 300j–7
Judicial review
Stat.×4
Fed. Reg.×3
Pub. L.Pub. L. 93-523
Stat.88 Stat. 1689
Pub. L.Pub. L. 99-339
Stat.100 Stat. 667
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104-182
Cites 6 · showing 5Cited by 7 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.