§ 1320a–2. Effect of failure to carry out State plan
375 words·~2 min read·
/usc/title-42/section-1320a-2A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
In an action brought to enforce a provision of this chapter, such provision is not to be deemed unenforceable because of its inclusion in a section of this chapter requiring a State plan or specifying the required contents of a State plan. This section is not intended to limit or expand the grounds for determining the availability of private actions to enforce State plan requirements other than by overturning any such grounds applied in Suter v. Artist M., 112 S. Ct. 1360 (1992), but not applied in prior Supreme Court decisions respecting such enforceability; provided, however, that this section is not intended to alter the holding in Suter v.
Artist M. that section 671(a)(15) of this title is not enforceable in a private right of action. ( Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531 , title XI, § 1123, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title V, § 555(a) , Oct. 20, 1994 , 108 Stat. 4057 .)
Connections14 off-index
14 references not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 103-382
- 108 Stat. 4057
- Pub. L. 92-603
- 86 Stat. 1418
- Pub. L. 96-499
- 94 Stat. 2619
- Pub. L. 97-248
- 96 Stat. 366
- Pub. L. 99-272
- 100 Stat. 189
- Pub. L. 100-360
- Pub. L. 100-485
- 102 Stat. 2412
- 108 Stat. 4058
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1320a–2
Effect of failure to carry out State plan
Pub. L.Pub. L. 103-382
Stat.108 Stat. 4057
Pub. L.Pub. L. 92-603
Stat.86 Stat. 1418
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96-499
Cites 14 · showing 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources