§ 1320a–10. Effect of failure to carry out State plan

218 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-42/section-1320a-10

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

In an action brought to enforce a provision of this chapter, such provision is not to be deemed unenforceable because of its inclusion in a section of this chapter requiring a State plan or specifying the required contents of a State plan. This section is not intended to limit or expand the grounds for determining the availability of private actions to enforce State plan requirements other than by overturning any such grounds applied in Suter v. Artist M., 112 S. Ct. 1360 (1992), but not applied in prior Supreme Court decisions respecting such enforceability:

Provided, however , That this section is not intended to alter the holding in Suter v. Artist M. that section 671(a)(15) of this title is not enforceable in a private right of action. ( Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531 , title XI, § 1130A, as added Pub. L. 103–432, title II, § 211(a) , Oct. 31, 1994 , 108 Stat. 4460 .)

Connections2 off-index

2 references not yet in our index

Pub. L. 103-432
108 Stat. 4460

Citation graph

cites case law

§ 1320a–10

Effect of failure to carry out State plan

Pub. L.Pub. L. 103-432

Stat.108 Stat. 4460

Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources