Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 41 - PUBLIC CONTRACTS · CHAPTER 47— MISCELLANEOUS · § 4711

§ 4711. Linking of award and incentive fees to acquisition outcomes

468 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-41/section-4711

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Definition.— In this section, the term “executive agency” has the same meaning given in section 133 of this title.
(b)Guidance for Executive Agencies on Linking of Award and Incentive Fees to Acquisition Outcomes.— The Federal Acquisition Regulation shall provide executive agencies other than the Department of Defense with instructions, including definitions, on the appropriate use of award and incentive fees in Federal acquisition programs.
(c)Elements.— The regulations under subsection
(b)shall—
(1)ensure that all new contracts using award fees link the fees to acquisition outcomes (which shall be defined in terms of program cost, schedule, and performance);
(2)establish standards for identifying the appropriate level of officials authorized to approve the use of award and incentive fees in new contracts;
(3)provide guidance on the circumstances in which contractor performance may be judged to be “excellent” or “superior” and the percentage of the available award fee which contractors should be paid for the performance;
(4)establish standards for determining the percentage of the available award fee, if any, which contractors should be paid for performance that is judged to be “acceptable”, “average”, “expected”, “good”, or “satisfactory”;
(5)ensure that no award fee may be paid for contractor performance that is judged to be below satisfactory performance or performance that does not meet the basic requirements of the contract;
(6)provide specific direction on the circumstances, if any, in which it may be appropriate to roll over award fees that are not earned in one award fee period to a subsequent award fee period or periods;
(7)ensure consistent use of guidelines and definitions relating to award and incentive fees across the Federal Government;
(8)ensure that each executive agency—
(A)collects relevant data on award and incentive fees paid to contractors; and
(B)has mechanisms in place to evaluate the data on a regular basis;
(9)include performance measures to evaluate the effectiveness of award and incentive fees as a tool for improving contractor performance and achieving desired program outcomes; and
(10)provide mechanisms for sharing proven incentive strategies for the acquisition of different types of products and services among contracting and program management officials.
(d)Guidance for Department of Defense.— The Department of Defense shall continue to be subject to guidance on award and incentive fees issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 814 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364, 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).
(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3800.)
In subsection (b), the words “Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act” are omitted because of section 6(f) of the bill. The words “shall provide” are substituted for “shall be amended to provide” to reflect the permanence of the provision.
Connectionstraces to 2
3 references not yet in our index
  • Public Law 109–364
  • Pub. L. 111–350, § 3
  • 124 Stat. 3800
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 4711
Linking of award and incentive fees to acquisition outcomes
Pub. L.Public Law 109–364
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111–350, § 3
Stat.124 Stat. 3800
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.