Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 41 - PUBLIC CONTRACTS · CHAPTER 47— MISCELLANEOUS · § 4705

§ 4705. Protection of contractor employees from reprisal for disclosure of certain information

777 words·~4 min read·/usc/title-41/section-4705

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Definitions.— In this section:
(1)Contract.— The term “contract” means a contract awarded by the head of an executive agency.
(2)Contractor.— The term “contractor” means a person awarded a contract with an executive agency.
(3)Inspector general.— The term “Inspector General” means an Inspector General appointed under chapter 4 of title 5.
(b)Prohibition of Reprisals.— An employee of a contractor may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a Member of Congress or an authorized official of an executive agency or the Department of Justice information relating to a substantial violation of law related to a contract (including the competition for, or negotiation of, a contract).
(c)Investigation of Complaints.— An individual who believes that the individual has been subjected to a reprisal prohibited by subsection
(b)may submit a complaint to the Inspector General of the executive agency. Unless the Inspector General determines that the complaint is frivolous, the Inspector General shall investigate the complaint and, on completion of the investigation, submit a report of the findings of the investigation to the individual, the contractor concerned, and the head of the agency. If the executive agency does not have an Inspector General, the duties of the Inspector General under this section shall be performed by an official designated by the head of the executive agency.
(d)Remedy and Enforcement Authority.—
(1)Actions contractor may be ordered to take.— If the head of an executive agency determines that a contractor has subjected an individual to a reprisal prohibited by subsection (b), the head of the executive agency may take one or more of the following actions:
(A)Abatement.— Order the contractor to take affirmative action to abate the reprisal.
(B)Reinstatement.— Order the contractor to reinstate the individual to the position that the individual held before the reprisal, together with the compensation (including back pay), employment benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment that would apply to the individual in that position if the reprisal had not been taken.
(C)Payment.— Order the contractor to pay the complainant an amount equal to the aggregate amount of all costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and expert witnesses’ fees) that the complainant reasonably incurred for, or in connection with, bringing the complaint regarding the reprisal, as determined by the head of the executive agency.
(2)Enforcement order.— When a contractor fails to comply with an order issued under paragraph (1), the head of the executive agency shall file an action for enforcement of the order in the United States district court for a district in which the reprisal was found to have occurred. In an action brought under this paragraph, the court may grant appropriate relief, including injunctive relief and compensatory and exemplary damages.
(3)Review of enforcement order.— A person adversely affected or aggrieved by an order issued under paragraph
(1)may obtain review of the order’s conformance with this subsection, and regulations issued to carry out this section, in the United States court of appeals for a circuit in which the reprisal is alleged in the order to have occurred. A petition seeking review must be filed no more than 60 days after the head of the agency issues the order. Review shall conform to chapter 7 of title 5.
(e)Scope of Section.— This section does not—
(1)authorize the discharge of, demotion of, or discrimination against an employee for a disclosure other than a disclosure protected by subsection (b); or
(2)modify or derogate from a right or remedy otherwise available to the employee.
(f)Four-year Suspension of Effectiveness While Pilot Program Is in Effect.— While section 4712 1 of this title is in effect, this section shall not be in effect.
(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3796; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, § 828(c), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1841; Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(b)(72), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4351.)
In subsection (d)(2), the word “contractor” is substituted for “person” for clarity and for consistency with subsection (d)(1).
Connections26 cite this · traces to 3
8 references not yet in our index
  • 1
  • Pub. L. 111–350, § 3
  • 124 Stat. 3796
  • Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, § 828(c)
  • 126 Stat. 1841
  • 136 Stat. 4351
  • 130 Stat. 1362
  • Pub. L. 112–239
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 4705
Protection of contractor employees from reprisal for disclosure of certain information
Fed. Reg.×22
U.S.C.×4
Cite1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111–350, § 3
Stat.124 Stat. 3796
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, § 828(c)
Stat.126 Stat. 1841
Cites 11 · showing 8Cited by 26 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.