Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 41 - PUBLIC CONTRACTS · CHAPTER 33— PLANNING AND SOLICITATION · § 3308

§ 3308. Planning for future competition in contracts for major systems

523 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-41/section-3308

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Development Contract.—
(1)Determining whether proposals are necessary.— In preparing a solicitation for the award of a development contract for a major system, the head of an agency shall consider requiring in the solicitation that an offeror include in its offer proposals described in paragraph (2). In determining whether to require the proposals, the head of the agency shall consider the purposes for which the system is being procured and the technology necessary to meet the system’s required capabilities. If the proposals are required, the head of the agency shall consider them in evaluating the offeror’s price.
(2)Contents of proposals.— The proposals that the head of an agency is to consider requiring in a solicitation for the award of a development contract are the following:
(A)Proposals to incorporate in the design of the major system items that are currently available within the supply system of the Federal agency responsible for the major system, available elsewhere in the national supply system, or commercially available from more than one source.
(B)With respect to items that are likely to be required in substantial quantities during the system’s service life, proposals to incorporate in the design of the major system items that the Federal Government will be able to acquire competitively in the future.
(b)Production Contract.—
(1)Determining whether proposals are necessary.— In preparing a solicitation for the award of a production contract for a major system, the head of an agency shall consider requiring in the solicitation that an offeror include in its offer proposals described in paragraph (2). In determining whether to require the proposals, the head of the agency shall consider the purposes for which the system is being procured and the technology necessary to meet the system’s required capabilities. If the proposals are required, the head of the agency shall consider them in evaluating the offeror’s price.
(2)Content of proposals.— The proposals that the head of an agency is to consider requiring in a solicitation for the award of a production contract are proposals identifying opportunities to ensure that the Federal Government will be able to obtain on a competitive basis items procured in connection with the system that are likely to be reprocured in substantial quantities during the service life of the system. Proposals submitted in response to this requirement may include the following:
(A)Proposals to provide to the Federal Government the right to use technical data to be provided under the contract for competitive reprocurement of the item, together with the cost to the Federal Government of acquiring the data and the right to use the data.
(B)Proposals for the qualification or development of multiple sources of supply for the item.
(c)Consideration of Factors as Objectives in Negotiations.— If the head of an agency is making a noncompetitive award of a development contract or a production contract for a major system, the factors specified in subsections
(a)and
(b)to be considered in evaluating an offer for a contract may be considered as objectives in negotiating the contract to be awarded.
(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3758.)
Connections1 cite this
Cited by 1 section
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 111–350, § 3
  • 124 Stat. 3758
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 3308
Planning for future competition in contracts for major systems
U.S.C.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111–350, § 3
Stat.124 Stat. 3758
Cites 2Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.