Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 35 - PATENTS · CHAPTER 31— INTER PARTES REVIEW · § 317

§ 317. Settlement

499 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-35/section-317

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In General.— An inter partes review instituted under this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed. If the inter partes review is terminated with respect to a petitioner under this section, no estoppel under section 315(e) shall attach to the petitioner, or to the real party in interest or privy of the petitioner, on the basis of that petitioner’s institution of that inter partes review. If no petitioner remains in the inter partes review, the Office may terminate the review or proceed to a final written decision under section 318(a).
(b)Agreements in Writing.— Any agreement or understanding between the patent owner and a petitioner, including any collateral agreements referred to in such agreement or understanding, made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of an inter partes review under this section shall be in writing and a true copy of such agreement or understanding shall be filed in the Office before the termination of the inter partes review as between the parties. At the request of a party to the proceeding, the agreement or understanding shall be treated as business confidential information, shall be kept separate from the file of the involved patents, and shall be made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause.
(Added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–570; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13202(a)(5), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, 1902; Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(a), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 303.)
Connections62 cite this · traces to 2
12 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4604(a)]
  • 113 Stat. 1536
  • Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13202(a)(5)
  • 116 Stat. 1901
  • Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(a)
  • 125 Stat. 303
  • Pub. L. 112–29
  • Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(c)(1)
  • Pub. L. 106–113
  • Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(a)(5)(A)
  • Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(a)(5)(B)
  • section 6(c)(2) of Pub. L. 112–29
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 317
Settlement
Fed. Reg.×60
C.F.R.×2
Pub. L.Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4604(a)]
Stat.113 Stat. 1536
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13202(a)(5)
Stat.116 Stat. 1901
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(a)
Cites 14 · showing 7Cited by 62 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.