Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 35 - PATENTS · CHAPTER 25— AMENDMENT AND CORRECTION OF PATENTS · § 251

§ 251. Reissue of defective patents

674 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-35/section-251

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In General.— Whenever any patent is, through error, deemed wholly or partly inoperative or invalid, by reason of a defective specification or drawing, or by reason of the patentee claiming more or less than he had a right to claim in the patent, the Director shall, on the surrender of such patent and the payment of the fee required by law, reissue the patent for the invention disclosed in the original patent, and in accordance with a new and amended application, for the unexpired part of the term of the original patent. No new matter shall be introduced into the application for reissue.
(b)Multiple Reissued Patents.— The Director may issue several reissued patents for distinct and separate parts of the thing patented, upon demand of the applicant, and upon payment of the required fee for a reissue for each of such reissued patents.
(c)Applicability of This Title.— The provisions of this title relating to applications for patent shall be applicable to applications for reissue of a patent, except that application for reissue may be made and sworn to by the assignee of the entire interest if the application does not seek to enlarge the scope of the claims of the original patent or the application for the original patent was filed by the assignee of the entire interest.
(d)Reissue Patent Enlarging Scope of Claims.— No reissued patent shall be granted enlarging the scope of the claims of the original patent unless applied for within two years from the grant of the original patent.
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §§ 4(b)(2), 20(d), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 296, 333.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 64 (R.S. 4916, amended May 24, 1928, ch. 730, 45 Stat. 732.)
The sentences of the corresponding section of existing statute are rearranged and divided into two sections with some changes in language. The clause at the end of the present statute is omitted as obsolete.
The third paragraph incorporates by reference the requirements of other applications, and adds a new provision relating to application for reissue being made in certain cases by the assignee.
A two year period of limitation on applying for broadened reissues is added, codifying the present rule of decision with a fixed period.
Connections77 cite this · traces to 3
17 references not yet in our index
  • July 19, 1952, ch. 950
  • 66 Stat. 808
  • Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)]
  • 113 Stat. 1536
  • Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B)
  • 116 Stat. 1906
  • Pub. L. 112–29
  • 125 Stat. 296
  • May 24, 1928, ch. 730
  • 45 Stat. 732
  • Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(d)
  • Pub. L. 112–29, § 4(b)(2)
  • Pub. L. 107–273
  • Pub. L. 106–113
  • section 4(b)(2) of Pub. L. 112–29
  • section 4(e) of Pub. L. 112–29
  • section 20(d) of Pub. L. 112–29
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 251
Reissue of defective patents
Fed. Reg.×73
C.F.R.×4
ActJuly 19, 1952, ch. 950
Stat.66 Stat. 808
Pub. L.Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)]
Stat.113 Stat. 1536
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B)
Cites 20 · showing 8Cited by 77 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.