Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 35 - PATENTS · CHAPTER 12— EXAMINATION OF APPLICATION · § 132

§ 132. Notice of rejection; reexamination

571 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-35/section-132

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Whenever, on examination, any claim for a patent is rejected, or any objection or requirement made, the Director shall notify the applicant thereof, stating the reasons for such rejection, or objection or requirement, together with such information and references as may be useful in judging of the propriety of continuing the prosecution of his application; and if after receiving such notice, the applicant persists in his claim for a patent, with or without amendment, the application shall be re­examined. No amendment shall introduce new matter into the disclosure of the invention.
(b)The Director shall prescribe regulations to provide for the continued examination of applications for patent at the request of the applicant. The Director may establish appropriate fees for such continued examination and shall provide a 50 percent reduction in such fees for small entities that qualify for reduced fees under section 41(h)(1).
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §§ 4403, 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–560, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 51 (R.S. 4903, amended Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 452, § 1, 53 Stat. 1213).
The first paragraph of the corresponding section of existing statute is revised in language and amplified to incorporate present practice; the second paragraph of the existing statute is placed in section 135.
The last sentence relating to new matter is added but represents no departure from present practice.
Connections328 cite this · traces to 4
Cited by 328 sections · top 60
register
16 references not yet in our index
  • July 19, 1952, ch. 950
  • 66 Stat. 801
  • Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §§ 4403, 4732(a)(10)(A)]
  • 113 Stat. 1536
  • Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B)
  • 116 Stat. 1906
  • Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(j)
  • 125 Stat. 335
  • Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 452, § 1
  • 53 Stat. 1213
  • Pub. L. 112–29
  • Pub. L. 107–273
  • Pub. L. 106–113, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)]
  • Pub. L. 106–113, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4403]
  • Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4405(b)]
  • Pub. L. 106–113
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 132
Notice of rejection; reexamination
Fed. Reg.×305
C.F.R.×21
Stat.×2
ActJuly 19, 1952, ch. 950
Stat.66 Stat. 801
Pub. L.Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §§ 4403, 4732(a)(10)(A)]
Stat.113 Stat. 1536
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B)
Cites 20 · showing 9Cited by 328 across 3 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.