Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 34 - CRIME CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT · CHAPTER 409— NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM · SUBCHAPTER I— TRANSMITTAL OF RECORDS · § 40917

§ 40917. Implementation plan

430 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-34/section-40917

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In general Not later than 1 year after March 23, 2018, the Attorney General, in coordination with the States and Indian tribal governments, shall establish, for each State or Indian tribal government, a plan to ensure maximum coordination and automation of the reporting or making available of appropriate records to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System established under section 40901 of this title and the verification of the accuracy of those records during a 4-year period specified in the plan. The records shall be limited to those of an individual described in subsection
(g)or
(b)Benchmark requirements Each plan established under this section shall include annual benchmarks to enable the Attorney General to assess the implementation of the plan, including—
(1)qualitative goals and quantitative measures; and
(2)a needs assessment, including estimated compliance costs.
(c)Compliance determination Not later than the end of each fiscal year beginning after the date of the establishment of an implementation plan under this section, the Attorney General shall determine whether each State or Indian tribal government has achieved substantial compliance with the benchmarks included in the plan.
(d)Accountability The Attorney General—
(1)shall disclose and publish, including on the website of the Department of Justice—
(A)the name of each State or Indian tribal government that received a determination of failure to achieve substantial compliance with an implementation plan under subsection
(c)for the preceding fiscal year; and
(B)a description of the reasons for which the Attorney General has determined that the State or Indian tribal government is not in substantial compliance with the implementation plan, including, to the greatest extent possible, a description of the types and amounts of records that have not been submitted; and
(2)if a State or Indian tribal government described in paragraph
(1)subsequently receives a determination of substantial compliance, shall—
(A)immediately correct the applicable record; and
(B)not later than 3 days after the determination, remove the record from the website of the Department of Justice and any other location where the record was published.
(e)Incentives For each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022, the Attorney General shall give affirmative preference to all Bureau of Justice Assistance discretionary grant applications of a State or Indian tribal government that received a determination of substantial compliance under subsection
(c)for the fiscal year in which the grant was solicited.
(Pub. L. 110–180, title I, § 107, as added Pub. L. 115–141, div. S, title VI, § 605(a), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1137.)
Connections12 cite this · traces to 3
3 references not yet in our index
  • 1
  • Pub. L. 110–180, title I, § 107
  • 132 Stat. 1137
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 40917
Implementation plan
U.S.C.×9
Pub. L.×1
Stat. Comp.×1
Stat.×1
Cite1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 110–180, title I, § 107
Stat.132 Stat. 1137
Cites 6Cited by 12 across 4 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.