§ 40902. Findings
498 words·~2 min read·
/usc/title-34/section-40902A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Congress finds the following:
(1)Approximately 916,000 individuals were prohibited from purchasing a firearm for failing a background check between November 30, 1998, (the date the National Instant Criminal Background Check System
(NICS)began operating) and December 31, 2004.
(2)From November 30, 1998, through December 31, 2004, nearly 49,000,000 Brady background checks were processed through NICS.
(3)Although most Brady background checks are processed through NICS in seconds, many background checks are delayed if the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI)does not have automated access to complete information from the States concerning persons prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm under Federal or State law.
(4)Nearly 21,000,000 criminal records are not accessible by NICS and millions of criminal records are missing critical data, such as arrest dispositions, due to data backlogs.
(5)The primary cause of delay in NICS background checks is the lack of—
(A)updates and available State criminal disposition records; and
(B)automated access to information concerning persons prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm because of mental illness, restraining orders, or misdemeanor convictions for domestic violence.
(6)Automated access to this information can be improved by—
(A)computerizing information relating to criminal history, criminal dispositions, mental illness, restraining orders, and misdemeanor convictions for domestic violence; or
(B)making such information available to NICS in a usable format.
(7)Helping States to automate these records will reduce delays for law-abiding gun purchasers.
(8)On March 12, 2002, the senseless shooting, which took the lives of a priest and a parishioner at the Our Lady of Peace Church in Lynbrook, New York, brought attention to the need to improve information-sharing that would enable Federal and State law enforcement agencies to conduct a complete background check on a potential firearm purchaser. The man who committed this double murder had a prior disqualifying mental health commitment and a restraining order against him, but passed a Brady background check because NICS did not have the necessary information to determine that he was ineligible to purchase a firearm under Federal or State law.
(9)On April 16, 2007, a student with a history of mental illness at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University shot to death 32 students and faculty members, wounded 17 more, and then took his own life. The shooting, the deadliest campus shooting in United States history, renewed the need to improve information-sharing that would enable Federal and State law enforcement agencies to conduct complete background checks on potential firearms purchasers. In spite of a proven history of mental illness, the shooter was able to purchase the two firearms used in the shooting. Improved coordination between State and Federal authorities could have ensured that the shooter’s disqualifying mental health information was available to NICS.
(Pub. L. 110–180, § 2, Jan. 8, 2008, 121 Stat. 2559.)
Connections34 cite this · traces to 1
Cited by 34 sections · top 29
statute-compilations
bill
- Sec. 103Grants to States for improvement of coordination and automation of NICS record reporting
- Sec. 101Reauthorization and improvements to NICS
- Sec. 103Definitions relating to mental health
- Sec. 106Reports and certifications to Congress
- Sec. 3Ineligibility due to disqualifying mental status
- Sec. 5Miscellaneous
- Sec. 3Reauthorization and improvements to NICS
- Sec. 5Definitions relating to mental health
- Sec. 7Reports and certifications to Congress
- Sec. 5Technical and conforming amendments
- Sec. 3Title 18 amendments
- Sec. 3Reauthorization and improvements to NICS
- Sec. 5Definitions relating to mental health
- Sec. 7Reports and certifications to Congress
- Sec. 3Title 18 amendments
- Sec. 5Technical and conforming amendments
- Sec. 2Definitions relating to mental health
- Sec. 7Technical and conforming amendments
- Sec. 206Ineligibility due to disqualifying mental status
- Sec. 4Conforming amendments
- Sec. 7Technical and conforming amendments
- Sec. 6Effect of expungement
- Sec. 3Reauthorization and improvements to NICS
- Sec. 5Definitions relating to mental health
- Sec. 7Reports and certifications to Congress
- Sec. 3Reauthorization and improvements to NICS
- Sec. 5Definitions relating to mental health
- Sec. 7Reports and certifications to Congress
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
2 references not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 110–180, § 2
- 121 Stat. 2559
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 3Cited by 34 across 2 sources