Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 34 - CRIME CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT · CHAPTER 121— VIOLENT CRIME CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT · SUBCHAPTER III— VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN · § 12312

§ 12312. Confidentiality of communications between sexual assault or domestic violence victims and their counselors

498 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-34/section-12312

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Study and development of model legislation The Attorney General shall—
(1)study and evaluate the manner in which the States have taken measures to protect the confidentiality of communications between sexual assault or domestic violence victims and their therapists or trained counselors;
(2)develop model legislation that will provide the maximum protection possible for the confidentiality of such communications, within any applicable constitutional limits, taking into account the following factors:
(A)the danger that counseling programs for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence will be unable to achieve their goal of helping victims recover from the trauma associated with these crimes if there is no assurance that the records of the counseling sessions will be kept confidential;
(B)consideration of the appropriateness of an absolute privilege for communications between victims of sexual assault or domestic violence and their therapists or trained counselors, in light of the likelihood that such an absolute privilege will provide the maximum guarantee of confidentiality but also in light of the possibility that such an absolute privilege may be held to violate the rights of criminal defendants under the Federal or State constitutions by denying them the opportunity to obtain exculpatory evidence and present it at trial; and
(C)consideration of what limitations on the disclosure of confidential communications between victims of these crimes and their counselors, short of an absolute privilege, are most likely to ensure that the counseling programs will not be undermined, and specifically whether no such disclosure should be allowed unless, at a minimum, there has been a particularized showing by a criminal defendant of a compelling need for records of such communications, and adequate procedural safeguards are in place to prevent unnecessary or damaging disclosures; and
(3)prepare and disseminate to State authorities the findings made and model legislation developed as a result of the study and evaluation.
(b)Report and recommendations Not later than the date that is 1 year after September 13, 1994, the Attorney General shall report to the Congress—
(1)the findings of the study and the model legislation required by this section; and
(2)recommendations based on the findings on the need for and appropriateness of further action by the Federal Government.
(c)Review of Federal evidentiary rules The Judicial Conference of the United States shall evaluate and report to Congress its views on whether the Federal Rules of Evidence should be amended, and if so, how they should be amended, to guarantee that the confidentiality of communications between sexual assault victims and their therapists or trained counselors will be adequately protected in Federal court proceedings.
(Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, § 40153, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1921.)
Connections2 cite this · traces to 1
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, § 40153
  • 108 Stat. 1921
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 12312
Confidentiality of communications between sexual assault or domestic violence victims and their counselors
Stat. Comp.×1
U.S.C.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, § 40153
Stat.108 Stat. 1921
Cites 3Cited by 2 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.