Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 34 - CRIME CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT · CHAPTER 101— JUSTICE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT · SUBCHAPTER V— BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAMS · § 10201

§ 10201. Evaluation

596 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-34/section-10201

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Guidelines and comprehensive evaluations To increase the efficiency and effectiveness of programs funded under this subchapter, the National Institute of Justice shall—
(1)develop guidelines, in cooperation with the Bureau of Justice Assistance, to assist State and local units of government to conduct program evaluations; and
(2)conduct a reasonable number of comprehensive evaluations of programs funded under section 10156 (formula grants) and section 10171 (discretionary grants) of this title.
(b)Criteria for selecting programs for review In selecting programs for review, the Director of the National Institute of Justice should consider—
(1)whether the program establishes or demonstrates a new and innovative approach to drug or crime control;
(2)the cost of the program to be evaluated and the number of similar programs funded under section 10156 (formula grants) of this title;
(3)whether the program has a high potential to be replicated in other jurisdictions; and
(4)whether there is substantial public awareness and community involvement in the program. Routine auditing, monitoring, and internal assessment of a State and local drug control program’s progress shall be the sole responsibility of the Bureau of Justice Assistance.
(c)Annual report The Director of the National Institute of Justice shall annually report to the President, the Attorney General, and the Congress on the nature and findings of the evaluation and research and development activities funded under this section.
(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, § 520, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, § 6091(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4337; amended Pub. L. 101–647, title XVIII, § 1801(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4848; Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1111(c)(2)(B), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3101.)
Connections15 cite this · traces to 2
30 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 90–351, title I, § 520
  • Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, § 6091(a)
  • 102 Stat. 4337
  • Pub. L. 101–647, title XVIII, § 1801(b)
  • 104 Stat. 4848
  • Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1111(c)(2)(B)
  • 119 Stat. 3101
  • section 520 of Pub. L. 90–351
  • 82 Stat. 208
  • Pub. L. 90–462, § 1
  • 82 Stat. 638
  • Pub. L. 91–644, title I, § 7(8)
  • 84 Stat. 1888
  • Pub. L. 93–83, § 2
  • 87 Stat. 214
  • Pub. L. 93–415, title V, § 544
  • 88 Stat. 1142
  • Pub. L. 94–430, § 3
  • 90 Stat. 1348
  • Pub. L. 94–503, title I, § 126
  • 90 Stat. 2423
  • Pub. L. 90–351
  • Pub. L. 96–157
  • Pub. L. 109–162, § 1111(c)(2)(B)(i)
  • section 3751(c) of this title
  • Pub. L. 109–162, § 1111(c)(2)(B)(ii)
  • Pub. L. 109–162, § 1111(c)(2)(B)(iii)
  • Pub. L. 101–647
  • Pub. L. 109–162
  • section 1111(d) of Pub. L. 109–162
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 10201
Evaluation
Bills×12
U.S.C.×2
Stat. Comp.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 90–351, title I, § 520
Pub. L.Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, § 6091(a)
Stat.102 Stat. 4337
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101–647, title XVIII, § 1801(b)
Stat.104 Stat. 4848
Cites 32 · showing 7Cited by 15 across 3 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.