§ 755. Judicial review
812 words·~4 min read·
/usc/title-31/section-755A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)A final decision under section 753(a)(1)–(3), (6),,1
(7)or
(9)of this title may be reviewed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Chapter 158 of title 28 applies to a review under this subchapter, except the petition for review shall be filed by the 30th day after the petitioner receives notice of the decision. The court shall set aside a final decision the court decides is—
(1)arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not consistent with law;
(2)not made consistent with required procedures; or
(3)unsupported by substantial evidence.
(b)If an officer, employee, applicant for employment, or employee of the Architect of the Capitol, the Botanic Garden, or the Senate Restaurants is the prevailing party in a proceeding under this section, and the decision is based on a finding of discrimination prohibited under section 732(f) of this title or under section 312(e)(2) 2 of the Architect of the Capitol Human Resources Act, attorney’s fees may be allowed by the court in accordance with the standards prescribed under section 706(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 902; Pub. L. 98–216, § 1(1), Feb. 14, 1984, 98 Stat. 3; Pub. L. 100–426, title I, § 103(a), (b), Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1599; Pub. L. 103–283, title III, § 312(e)(4)(C), July 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 1446.)
In the section, before clause (1), the first sentence is substituted for 31:52–3(l)(1)(1st sentence) for consistency with other titles of the United States Code. The word “review” is substituted for “appeal” for consistency. The words “the procedures of”, “any other provision of law”, “of a final decision of the Board . . . the date . . . of the Board”, and “In any case filed under paragraph
(1). . . review the record and” are omitted as surplus. The words “final decision” are substituted for “agency action, findings, or conclusions” for consistency. Clause
(2)is substituted for 31:52–3(l)(2)(B) to eliminate unnecessary words.
1984 Act
This clarifies section 755 by conforming it more closely to the language of the source provision of the section.
Connections5 cite this · traces to 5
Cited by 5 sections
Traces to 5 documents
21 references not yet in our index
- 1
- 2
- Pub. L. 97–258
- 96 Stat. 902
- Pub. L. 98–216, § 1(1)
- 98 Stat. 3
- Pub. L. 100–426, title I, § 103(a)
- 102 Stat. 1599
- Pub. L. 103–283, title III, § 312(e)(4)(C)
- 108 Stat. 1446
- Pub. L. 104–1, title V, § 504(c)(1)
- 109 Stat. 41
- Pub. L. 103–283, § 312(e)(4)(C)(i)
- Pub. L. 103–283
- Pub. L. 103–283, § 312(e)(4)(C)(ii)
- Pub. L. 100–426, § 103(a)
- Pub. L. 100–426, § 103(b)(2)
- Pub. L. 98–216
- Pub. L. 100–426, title I, § 103(c)
- section 312(e) of Pub. L. 103–283
- section 504(c)(2) of Pub. L. 104–1
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 755
Judicial review
Stat.×3
C.F.R.×1
U.S.C.×1
Cite1
Cite2
Pub. L.Pub. L. 97–258
Stat.96 Stat. 902
Pub. L.Pub. L. 98–216, § 1(1)
Cites 26 · showing 10Cited by 5 across 3 sources